Reductions of human enteric viruses in 10 commonly used activated carbon, polypropylene and polyester household drinking-water filters. (15th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pang, Liping; Lin, Susan; McGill, Erin; Tham, Annabelle; Hewitt, Joanne; Nokes, Chris; Ward, Vernon
• Is Part Of: Water research. Volume 213(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-04-15
• Subjects: Enteric viruses -- Point-of-use filters -- Drinking water -- Log10 reduction value -- Attachment; Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118174
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1354

Abstract

Highlights: Norovirus and adenovirus reductions did not differ significantly ( P > 0.49). Rotavirus reductions were lower than the other viruses in carbon filters ( P ≤ 0.009). Virus reductions were similar in polypropylene and polyester filters ( P > 0.24). Carbon filters outperformed polymeric filters in virus reductions ( P ≤ 0.0001). None of the filters met the "protective" rotavirus reduction level of ≥3 log10 . Abstract: Drinking-water treatment in non-networked rural communities relies on the use of point-of-use (PoU) household filters. Source waters treated by PoU filters are often microbially contaminated, but information about human enteric virus reductions in these filters is limited. This study evaluated human rotavirus, adenovirus and norovirus reductions in 10 commonly used, new PoU carbon, polypropylene and polyester microfilters. The viruses were spiked into chlorine-free tap water (pH 8.0, ionic strength 1.22 mM), and 3 sequential challenge tests were conducted in each filter under a constant flow rate of 1 L/min. In most of the filters investigated, the norovirus and adenovirus reductions were similar ( P > 0.49). Compared with the norovirus and adenovirus reductions, the rotavirus reductions were significantly lower in the carbon filters ( P ≤ 0.009), which may relate to rotavirus's higher zeta potential and lower hydrophobicity. Virus reductions appeared to be dictated by the filter media type through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions; the effects of filter media pore sizes on virus reductions via physical size-exclusion were very limited. The virus reductions in the carbon filters were significantly greater than those in the polypropylene and polyester filters ( P ≤ 0.0001), and they did not differ significantly between the polypropylene and polyester filters ( P > 0.24). None of the filters met the "protective" rotavirus reduction level (≥3 log10 ) required for household drinking-water treatment. Our study's findings highlight a critical need for additional water treatment when using PoU microfilters, for example, water boiling or ultraviolet radiation, or the use of effective surface-modified filter media to prevent drinking-waterborne infections from enteric viruses. Graphical abstract: Image, graphical abstract