Prehospital Providers' Perspectives about Online Medical Direction in Emergency End-of-Life Decision-Making. (4th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Waldrop, Deborah P.; Waldrop, Michael R.; McGinley, Jacqueline M.; Crowley, Charlotte R.; Clemency, Brian
• Is Part Of: Prehospital emergency care. Volume 26:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 223
• Page End: 232
• Publication Date: 2022-03-04
• Subjects: Online Medical Direction (OLMD) -- end-of-life decision-making -- Termination of Resuscitation (TOR); 362.18
• DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1863532
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-3127

Abstract

Abstract: Background: End-of-life treatment decisions present special challenges for prehospital emergency providers. Paramedics regularly make value-laden choices that transcend technical judgment and professional skill, affecting the type of care, how and to whom it is provided. Changes in prehospital emergency care over the last decade have created new moral challenges for prehospital emergency providers; these changes have also accentuated the need for paramedics to make rapid and reasoned ethical judgments. Objective: The purpose of the study was to explore the decision-making process that occurs when prehospital emergency teams respond to an end-of-life call with a focus on how state authorized documents such as a Non-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (NHDNR) or Medical/Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST/POLST) or lack thereof inform decision-making. This paper presents the specific circumstances that informed the need for intervention from Online Medical Direction (OLMD) framed in the perspectives and words of the prehospital providers seeking that assistance. Methods : This study involved in-depth in-person interviews with 50 providers to elicit participants' experiences in their own words using a semi-structured interview instrument. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed with permission. Results: Five themes emerged that illuminated how and when OLMD was involved in emergency end-of-life decisions: Termination of Resuscitation (TOR); Family Revoked DNR; Missing Documents; No Documents and No CPR; and Unusual Situations. Participants illustrated how the decision to terminate efforts was best-supported when it was made by collaboration between the on-scene provider and OLMD. Participants described ethical dilemmas when families asked them to initiate CPR in the presence of DNR orders and cognitive dissonance when CPR has been initiated but a valid DNR/MOLST is subsequently located. Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate the invaluable contribution of OLMD for complex end-of-life care decisions by prehospital providers, especially when there are difficult legal, ethical, and logistical questions. OLMD provides far more than technical support.