Income comparison and happiness: The role of fair income distribution. (3rd August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Yongwei; Fu, Dahai; Ye, Xinyue
• Is Part Of: Australian economic papers. Volume 60:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 41
• Page End: 63
• Publication Date: 2020-08-03
• Subjects: fairness -- happiness -- inequality -- relative income -- well‐being -- JEL codes I31, D31, D63, J31; Economics -- Periodicals; Australia -- Economic conditions -- Periodicals; 330
• DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.12193
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0004-900X

Abstract

Abstract: Relative income gap is one of the most popular approaches for explaining the income–happiness relationship. We argue in this article that when people compare their incomes, they care about distributional fairness more than relative income disparity. It is difficult for us to explain China's income–happiness paradox if we simply compare the income gap and do not explore the income‐generation process leading to income inequality. We therefore employ an approach based on a responsibility‐sensitive theory of justice that decomposes individual income into fair and unfair components. As a proxy for distributional unfairness, unfair income is considered the main source of unhappiness. Using data from the Chinese Household Income Project survey, we find strong support for the negative relationship between income unfairness and happiness. We also find a significantly positive relationship between the relative income gap and income unfairness, which leads us to consider the income comparison hypothesis as the explanation for the income–happiness paradox in a new light. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.