Incidence of epicardial connections between the right pulmonary vein carina and right atrium during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison between the conventional method and unipolar signal modification. Issue 1 (27th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yano, Hiroki; Nishida, Taku; Sugiura, Junichi; Keshi, Ayaka; Kanaoka, Koshiro; Terasaki, Satoshi; Hashimoto, Yukihiro; Nakada, Yasuki; Nakagawa, Hitoshi; Ueda, Tomoya; Seno, Ayako; Onoue, Kenji; Watanabe, Makoto; Saito, Yoshihiko
• Is Part Of: Journal of arrhythmia. Volume 38:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 97
• Page End: 105
• Publication Date: 2021-12-27
• Subjects: atrial fibrillation -- carina -- epicardial connection -- high‐power -- unipolar signal modification; Arrhythmia -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Arrhythmia; Cardiac pacing; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.128
• DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12672
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1880-4276

Abstract

Abstract: Background: When performing an electrical isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs) for atrial fibrillation, physicians often need additional radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the carina region between the superior and inferior PVs to achieve a right PV isolation because of intercaval bundles between the right PVs and right atrium (RA). We compared the efficacy of a high‐power and short‐duration ablation guided by unipolar signal modification (UM) with the conventional method (CM) for ablating epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA. Methods: The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent an initial box isolation of atrial fibrillation from January 2015 to December 2019 at Nara Medical University Hospital. Among these patients, 94 and 65 patients who met the criteria were assigned to the CM and UM groups, respectively. We retrospectively analyzed the anterior ablation line of the right PV using an electroanatomical mapping system. Patients whose initial ablation line included the right PV carina were excluded. Results: Six and seven patients were, respectively, excluded from the CM and UM groups. Among 88 CM group patients, 21 needed additional right PV carina ablation, while among 58 UM group patients, 30 needed additional right PV carina ablation ( p = .001). No anatomical factors were associated with the additional right PV carina ablation. Conclusions: Compared to the CM group, a box isolation was less achievable without RF ablation at the right PV carina in the UM group. We should consider a long‐duration ablation for epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA. Abstract : The safety and efficacy of a high‐power (40–50 W) ablation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint has been reported. There have been some reports about epicardial connections between the pulmonary veins and right atrium (RA). A box isolation was less achievable without additional radiofrequency ablation on the right PV carina in a high‐power and short‐duration ablation guided by unipolar signal modification group than in the conventional long‐duration ablation group.