Desert bighorn sheep habitat selection, group size, and mountain lion predation risk. Issue 2 (11th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, Andrew S.; Rubin, Esther S.; Clement, Matthew J.; Harding, Larisa E.; Mesler, Jacob I.
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 86:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-01-11
• Subjects: Arizona -- bighorn sheep -- mortality -- mountain lion -- Ovis canadensis -- predation -- Puma concolor -- Sonoran Desert; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

Abstract: Bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis ) evolved for thousands of years in the presence of numerous predators, including mountain lions ( Puma concolor ). Bighorn sheep have presumably developed predator avoidance strategies; however, the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing risk of mountain lion predation is not well understood. These strategies are of increasing interest because mountain lion predation on bighorn sheep has been identified as a leading cause of mortality in some sheep populations. Therefore, we investigated how mountain lions affect both bighorn sheep habitat selection and risk of mortality in Arizona, USA. We used 2 approaches to investigate the predator‐prey relationship between mountain lions and bighorn sheep. We fit 103 bighorn sheep (81 females and 22 males) with global positioning system radio‐collars in 2 Arizona populations from 2013 to 2017, and used a negative binomial resource selection probability function to evaluate whether bighorn sheep selected for habitat features in accordance with presumed predator avoidance strategies, including terrain ruggedness, slope, topographic position, and horizontal obstruction, in 2 seasons (winter and summer). We then estimated how habitat features such as terrain ruggedness, slope, horizontal obstruction, and group size, influence the risk of mortality due to mountain lion predation using an Andersen‐Gill proportional hazards model. Generally, both sexes selected areas with lower horizontal obstruction and intermediate ruggedness and slope, but selection patterns differed between seasons and sexes. The use of more rugged areas and steeper slopes decreased the risk of mortality due to mountain lion predation, consistent with presumed predator avoidance strategies. Increased group size decreased risk of bighorn sheep mortality due to mountain lion predation but this effect became marginal at approximately 10 individuals/group. We did not identify a relationship between horizontal obstruction and bighorn sheep mortality risk. Our findings can be used in habitat and population management decisions such as the prioritization of habitat restoration sites or selection of translocation sites. In addition, we suggest that augmentation of low‐density bighorn sheep populations may reduce mountain lion predation risk by increasing group size, and that releasing large groups of bighorn sheep in population augmentation and reintroduction efforts may help to reduce mountain lion predation. Abstract : Bighorn sheep selected for areas with decreased horizontal obstruction and areas of intermediate slope and ruggedness. Ruggedness, steep slopes, and increased bighorn sheep group size decrease the risk of bighorn sheep mortality due to mountain lion predation. We suggest that habitat manipulations, such as prescribed fire, and translocating larger groups of bighorn sheep may increase the amount of available bighorn sheep habitat and decrease the risk of bighorn sheep mortality due to mountain lion predation, respectively.