Adapting patients' oncological treatment through remote participation of general practitioners in multi-disciplinary consultation meetings: A feasibility study. Issue 1 (31st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Druel, Vladimir; Gimenez, Laetitia; Tachousin, Paul; Boussier, Nathalie; Bauvin, Eric; Pascale, Grosclaude; Beyne-Rauzy, Odile; Rougé Bugat, Marie-Eve
• Is Part Of: European journal of general practice. Volume 28:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 15
• Page End: 22
• Publication Date: 2022-12-31
• Subjects: Multi-disciplinary communication -- general practitioners -- medical oncology -- patient care team -- telemedicine; Family medicine -- Periodicals; 362.172
• DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.2003775
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1381-4788

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The general practitioner (GP) is central to managing patients with cancer, whose numbers are increasing worldwide. The GP's involvement requires better coordination between involved partners, in particular oncologists and GPs. Objectives: To conduct a feasibility study of remote participation of GPs in multi-disciplinary consultation meetings (MCMs). We analysed participation, participants' satisfaction, and their impact on therapeutic decisions. Methods: We conducted a feasibility study in the regional cancer centre of Toulouse, France. All patient cases discussed in the MCMs for myelodysplasia from 1 January to 31 March 2016 were included. Cases of patients aged over 18 years, with a diagnosis of myelodysplasia and registered with a GP were included if patients gave informed consent. One investigator collected the data provided by GPs during three telephone or video calls: before, during, and after the MCM, respectively. Results: Of 86 patient cases discussed during three months of MCMs, 44 were eligible for GP participation; 27 GPs participated in discussions of 27 patient cases. The GP's participation in the MCM led to a change in management in five cases, with four times treatment intensifications and once de-intensification. Medical, social, family-related, and psychological domains were discussed with input from the GPs. Overall, all participants were satisfied with the MCMs. Conclusion: Remote participation of GPs in MCMs is feasible and may result in adapting oncological and haematological management for patients. This patient-centred approach requires a specific organisation that, when implemented, satisfies the needs of all participants.