A Systematic Review of Responsibility Frames and Their Effects in the Health Context. Issue 12 (2nd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Temmann, Linn Julia; Wiedicke, Annemarie; Schaller, Sophia; Scherr, Sebastian; Reifegerste, Doreen
• Is Part Of: Journal of health communication. Volume 26:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: 828
• Page End: 838
• Publication Date: 2021-12-02
• Subjects: Communication in medicine -- Periodicals; 610.14
• DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.2020381
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1081-0730

Abstract

Abstract : Responsibility frames potentially shape the public perception of health issues such as obesity, diabetes, or mental illness, specifically regarding responsibility attributions for their causes and treatment. Which responsibility frames prevail in the health context, and the responses they may elicit from audiences, has not been studied systematically. This systematic review includes studies with different methodological approaches published between 2004 and 2019 ( N = 68). Content analyses ( n = 56) show that different media attribute health responsibility most frequently, but not exclusively to individuals. Individual responsibility was especially emphasized for obesity, which was also the most studied health issue. Tendencies toward societal attributions of responsibility emerged over time, particularly regarding health risks for which the frames describe a specific cause (e.g., sugar, trans-fat). Experimental studies ( n = 12) indicate that individual responsibility frames reduce policy support. The effects of responsibility frames were, however, not as clear-cut as expected with research gaps regarding behavioral and affective outcomes. Overall, there is a clear emphasis on noncommunicable diseases in this field. Finally, the conceptual focus on individual vs. societal health responsibility distracts from social network influences as another relevant health determinant. The implications for health communication are discussed.