A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, single-center, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects. (1st February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, single-center, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects. (1st February 2022)
- Main Title:
- A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, single-center, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects
- Authors:
- Liu, Guangwen
Xu, Zhongnan
Yang, Wei
Xue, Jinling
Wang, Yanli
Liu, Zhengzhi
Cui, Yingzi
Qu, Xinyao
Chang, Tianying
Yu, Shuang
Cheng, Yang
Zhou, Yannan
Chen, Jiahui
Ren, Qing
Wang, Wanhua
Deng, Qiaohuan
Wang, Zeyu
Yang, Haimiao - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Perjeta® is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody that has been marketed and approved for the targeted therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) positive breast cancer in the United States. This study compared the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of pertuzumab injection (a biosimilar of Perjeta® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Perjeta® (produced by Roche Pharma AG) in healthy Chinese males. Research design and methods: Healthy Chinese male subjects (N = 87) were randomly given intravenous injection of 5 mg/kg pertuzumab or Perjeta® at a 1:1 ratio. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and primary pharmacokinetic parameters were statistically analyzed. We detected the levels of anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) to evaluate drug immunogenicity and safety of the drugs throughout the study. Results: The geometric mean ratios of AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ for pertuzumab and Perjeta® were 100.42%, 96.71%, and 101.47%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%–125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. The levels of ADA and nAb were similar. In addition, both had good safety in the study. Conclusion: The study shows that pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® had similar bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety.
- Is Part Of:
- Expert opinion on biological therapy. Volume 22:Number 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Expert opinion on biological therapy
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0022-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 187
- Page End:
- 195
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-01
- Subjects:
- Pertuzumab injection -- Perjeta® -- HER2 -- bioequivalence -- immunogenicity -- safety
Gene therapy -- Periodicals
Protein drugs -- Periodicals
Peptide drugs -- Periodicals
Immunotherapy -- Periodicals
Drug delivery systems -- Periodicals
615.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/journal/ebt ↗
http://www.ashley-pub.com/loi/ebt ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/iebt20/current ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗
http://miranda.ashley-pub.com/vl=2623054/cl=18/nw=1/rpsv/journal/journal1_home.htm ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14712598.2021.1988567 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-2598
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3842.002940
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21116.xml