Stability of the polyynic form of C18, C22, C26, and C30 nanorings: a challenge tackled by range-separated double-hybrid density functionals. Issue 7 (4th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brémond, E.; Pérez-Jiménez, A. J.; Adamo, C.; Sancho-García, J. C.
• Is Part Of: Physical chemistry chemical physics. Volume 24:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 4515
• Page End: 4525
• Publication Date: 2022-02-04
• Subjects: Chemistry, Physical and theoretical -- Periodicals; 541.3
• DOI: 10.1039/d1cp04996h
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1463-9076

Abstract

Abstract : We calculate the relative energy between the cumulene and polyyne structures of a set of C4 k +2 ( k = 4–7) rings (C18, C22, C26, and C30 prompted by the recent synthesis of the cyclo[18]carbon (or simply C18 ) compounds. Abstract : We calculate the relative energy between the cumulene and polyyne structures of a set of C4 k +2 ( k = 4–7) rings (C18, C22, C26, and C30 prompted by the recent synthesis of the cyclo[18]carbon (or simply C18 ) compounds. Reference results were obtained by a costly Quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) approach, providing thus very accurate values allowing to systematically compare the performance of a variety of wavefunction methods [( i.e., MP2, SCS-MP2, SOS-MP2, DLPNO-CCSD, and DLPNO-CCSD(T)] as well as DFT approaches, applying for the latter a diversity of density functionals covering global and range-separated hybrid and double-hybrid models. The influence of the use of a range-separation scheme for density functionals, for both hybrid and double-hybrid expressions, is discussed according to its key role. Overall, range-separated double-hybrid functionals ( e.g., RSX-QIDH) behave very accurately and provide competitive results compared with DLPNO-CCSD(T), at a more reasonable computational cost.