Drag and heat flux reduction induced by the pulsed counterflowing jet with different periods on a blunt body in supersonic flows. (December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Rui-rui; Huang, Wei; Li, Lang-quan; Yan, Li; Moradi, R.
• Is Part Of: International journal of heat and mass transfer. Volume 127(2018)Part C
• Page Start: 503
• Page End: 512
• Publication Date: 2018-12
• Subjects: Pulsed counterflowing jet -- Period -- Waveform -- Drag reduction -- Heat flux reduction -- Supersonic flow; Heat -- Transmission -- Periodicals; Mass transfer -- Periodicals; Chaleur -- Transmission -- Périodiques; Transfert de masse -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 621.4022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.066
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9310

Abstract

Highlights: Drag and heat flux reduction induced by pulsed counterflowing jet was studied. Influence of pulsation frequency on drag and heat flux reduction was investigated. Larger period is beneficial for drag and heat flux reduction. Heat flux reduction effect of pulsed counterflowing jet is evident. Abstract: In the current study, three different kinds of pulsed jets with the period being 0.5 ms, 1.0 ms and 2.0 ms are established, and sinusoidal waveforms are used in all three pulsed jets. The pulsed counterflowing jets with the same amplitude but different periods on the nose of a blunt body in supersonic flows are investigated numerically, and an axisymmetric numerical simulation model of the counterflowing jet on the supersonic vehicle nose-tip is established. The obtained results show that the wall Stanton number and surface pressure change periodically with the pulsed jet, and the variations of the parameters show a strong hysteresis phenomenon. The hysteresis phenomenon becomes less significant as the period increases. At the same time, a better drag and heat flux reduction is obtained under larger period pulsed jet conditions. With the increase of the period of the pulsed jet, there is a significant decline in the maximum peak values of the wall Stanton number and surface pressure. Compared with the steady jet, the pulsed jet is more effective in heat flux reduction, but the drag reduction of the pulsed jet is less effective than the steady jet.