Understanding the clinical implications of differences between glucose management indicator and glycated haemoglobin. Issue 4 (8th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gomez‐Peralta, Fernando; Choudhary, Pratik; Cosson, Emmanuel; Irace, Concetta; Rami‐Merhar, Birgit; Seibold, Alexander
• Is Part Of: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. Volume 24:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 599
• Page End: 608
• Publication Date: 2022-02-08
• Subjects: average glucose -- continuous glucose monitoring -- diabetes -- glucose management indicator -- HbA1c; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Obesity -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals; Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1111/dom.14638
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8902

Abstract

Abstract: Laboratory measured glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for assessing glycaemic control in people with diabetes and correlates with their risk of long‐term complications. The emergence of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has highlighted limitations of HbA1c testing. HbA1c can only be reviewed infrequently and can mask the risk of hypoglycaemia or extreme glucose fluctuations. While CGM provides insights in to the risk of hypoglycaemia as well as daily fluctuations of glucose, it can also be used to calculate an estimated HbA1c that has been used as a substitute for laboratory HbA1c. However, it is evident that estimated HbA1c and HbA1c values can differ widely. The glucose management indicator (GMI), calculated exclusively from CGM data, has been proposed. It uses the same scale (% or mmol/mol) as HbA1c, but is based on short‐term average glucose values, rather than long‐term glucose exposure. HbA1c and GMI values differ in up to 81% of individuals by more than ±0.1% and by more than ±0.3% in 51% of cases. Here, we review the factors that define these differences, such as the time period being assessed, the variation in glycation rates and factors such as anaemia and haemoglobinopathies. Recognizing and understanding the factors that cause differences between HbA1c and GMI is an important clinical skill. In circumstances when HbA1c is elevated above GMI, further attempts at intensification of therapy based solely on the HbA1c value may increase the risk of hypoglycaemia. The observed difference between GMI and HbA1c also informs the important question about the predictive ability of GMI regarding long‐term complications.