Predicting machine's performance record using the stacked long short‐term memory (LSTM) neural networks. Issue 3 (16th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ma, Min; Liu, Chenbin; Wei, Ran; Liang, Bin; Dai, Jianrong
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 23:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-02-16
• Subjects: long short‐term memory networks (LSTM) -- predictive time series -- quality control -- radiotherapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13558
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The record of daily quality control (QC) items shows machine performance patterns and potentially provides warning messages for preventive actions. This study developed a neural network model that could predict the record and trend of data variations quantitively. Methods and materials: The record of 24 QC items for a radiotherapy machine was investigated in our institute. The QC records were collected daily for 3 years. The stacked long short‐term memory (LSTM) model was used to develop the neural network model. A total of 867 records were collected to predict the record for the next 5 days. To compare the stacked LSTM, the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) was developed on the same data set. The accuracy of the model was quantified by the mean absolute error (MAE), root‐mean‐square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). To validate the robustness of the model, the record of four QC items was collected for another radiotherapy machine, which was input into the stacked LSTM model without changing any hyperparameters and ARIMA model. Results: The mean MAE, RMSE, and R 2 ${\rm{\;}}{R^2}$ with 24 QC items were 0.013, 0.020, and 0.853 in LSTM, while 0.021, 0.030, and 0.618 in ARIMA, respectively. The results showed that the stacked LSTM outperforms the ARIMA. Moreover, the mean MAE, RMSE, and R 2 ${\rm{\;}}{R^2}$ with four QC items were 0.102, 0.151, and 0.770 in LSTM, while 0.162, 0.375, and 0.550 in ARIMA, respectively. Conclusions: In this study, the stacked LSTM model can accurately predict the record and trend of QC items. Moreover, the stacked LSTM model is robust when applied to another radiotherapy machine. Predicting future performance record will foresee possible machine failure, allowing early machine maintenance and reducing unscheduled machine downtime.