A115 ACCURACY OF OPTICAL DIAGNOSIS IN ENDOSCOPY AT A TERTIARY ACADEMIC CENTER. (21st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pattni, C; Fecso, A; Jugnundan, S; Gupta, S; Teshima, C W; Mosko, J
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Volume 5(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 133
• Page End: 134
• Publication Date: 2022-02-21
• Subjects: Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab049.114
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-2084

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Optical diagnosis relies on the ability of the endoscopist to visualize normal and abnormal patterns on the epithelial surface of the gastrointestinal tract. With ongoing technologic advances in image-enhanced and magnifying endoscopy, there has been more attention given to improving our ability to visually evaluate and classify lesions as this can help guide decisions around resection techniques. However, the accuracy of optical diagnosis of epithelial lesions remains under investigated. Aims: To analyse (1) the presence or absence of descriptive details (size, gross morphology, and classification systems used) of lesions of interest within the endoscopy report and (2) the accuracy of the optical diagnosis, when stated, as compared to the final pathology report. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective chart review and quality improvement initiative conducted at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. All patients who had polypectomy performed between January 1 st, 2019 and December 31 st, 2020 for polyp(s) > 10mm in size, were eligible for study inclusion. Patients were excluded if polyps did not meet the size criteria, the polyp was not resected, or absent documentation. Descriptive statistics were conducted. Results: 2100 patients had polypectomies during the study period. 714 patients with 833 polyps >10mm in size were included in the data analysis. Estimated size was reported for 93% of polyps, gross morphology for 68%, and a classification system for 72%. All three description parameters were reported for 52% of polyps. Predicted pathology was recorded in 41% of polyps. When documented, the accuracy of optical diagnosis was 71%. Conclusions: In our study, the presence of key descriptive details attributed to polyps at the time of polypectomy was lower than expected. In addition, an optical diagnosis was documented in less than half of the time. Finally, the overall accuracy of optical diagnosis was lower than predicted potentially related to the underreporting and underutilization the important predictors of submucosal invasion. Considering that making real-time endoscopic diagnoses has major implications on treatment decisions, it is imperative that we work on these skills to improve patient outcomes (increasing R0 resection rates, decreasing recurrence and avoiding unnecessary surgeries). Through this project, recommendations will be made regarding the implementation of synoptic reporting in addition to guiding future quality improvement initiatives. Funding Agencies: None