Influence of crystallographic orientation on the recrystallization of pure tantalum through microstructure-based estimation of the stored energy. (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baton, J.; Geslin, W.; Moussa, C.
• Is Part Of: International journal of refractory metals & hard materials. Volume 104(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: Tantalum -- Dislocation substructures -- Stored energy -- Crystallographic orientation -- Recrystallization -- EBSD; Heat resistant alloys -- Periodicals; Refractory materials -- Periodicals; Metallography -- Periodicals; Alliages réfractaires -- Périodiques; Matériaux réfractaires -- Périodiques; Métallographie -- Périodiques; Heat resistant alloys; Metallography; Refractory materials; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 669.73
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105786
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-4368

Abstract

Abstract: Plastic deformation and static recrystallization of pure tantalum are studied using Electron BackScatter Diffraction (EBSD) technique. Recrystallization kinetics are discussed in light of stored energy estimation from EBSD data acquired on deformed microstructures. Characterization of deformed state reveals the influence of crystallographic orientation on the plastic deformation. Dislocation substructures are formed in the γ-fiber grains and almost no substructures are observed in the θ-fiber grains. Subsequent recrystallization directly inherits this orientation dependence of deformed state. Nucleation is promoted in the γ-fiber grains because of substructure development whereas nucleation is more sluggish to occur in the θ-fiber grains. Thus, a microstructure composed mostly of γ-fiber grains recrystallizes faster than a microstructure with a less strong texture, despite a strain nearly three times lower. At the polycrystalline scale (step size of 1.20 μm in the present case), recrystallization kinetics are better described with stored energy estimated through substructures than through dislocation density. At the substructure scale (step size of 90 nm), Geometrically Necessary Dislocation (GND) density seems to be correctly estimated; still recrystallization kinetics cannot be accounted for by this density because it does not account for the substructure formation. Highlights: Recrystallization of pure tantalum is affected by the crystallographic orientation. Substructures are formed in γ-fiber grains and almost absent in θ-fiber grains. Recrystallization is faster in γ-fiber grains and slower in θ-fiber grains. Dislocation density estimated from EBSD data does not allow to predict this effect. Stored energy should be estimated taking into account dislocation substructures.