A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Approach to Assessing and Monitoring Suicidal Ideation: Results from A National US Trauma Care System Study. Issue 1 (2nd January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Approach to Assessing and Monitoring Suicidal Ideation: Results from A National US Trauma Care System Study. Issue 1 (2nd January 2022)
- Main Title:
- A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Approach to Assessing and Monitoring Suicidal Ideation: Results from A National US Trauma Care System Study
- Authors:
- Engstrom, Allison
Moloney, Kathleen
Nguyen, Jefferson
Parker, Lea
Roberts, Michelle
Moodliar, Rddhi
Russo, Joan
Wang, Jin
Scheuer, Hannah
Zatzick, Douglas - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: Few investigations have comprehensively described methods for assessing and monitoring suicidal ideation in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services interventions. This investigation's goal was to assess a collaborative care intervention's effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation and describe suicide monitoring implementation in a nationwide protocol. Method: The investigation was a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at 25-Level I trauma centers. Injury survivors (N = 635) were randomized to control (n = 370) and intervention (n = 265) conditions and assessed at baseline hospitalization and follow-up at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) item-9 was used to evaluate patients for suicidal ideation. Mixed model regression was used to assess intervention versus control group changes in PHQ-9 item-9 scores over time and associations between baseline characteristics and development of suicidal ideation longitudinally. As part of the study implementation process assessment, suicide outreach call logs were also reviewed. Results: Over 50% of patients endorsed suicidal ideation at ≥1 assessment. Intervention patients relative to control patients demonstrated reductions in endorsements of suicidal ideation that did not achieve statistical significance (F[3, 1461] = 0.74, P = .53). The study team completed outreach phone calls, texts or voice messages to 268 patients with PHQ-9Abstract : Objective: Few investigations have comprehensively described methods for assessing and monitoring suicidal ideation in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services interventions. This investigation's goal was to assess a collaborative care intervention's effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation and describe suicide monitoring implementation in a nationwide protocol. Method: The investigation was a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at 25-Level I trauma centers. Injury survivors (N = 635) were randomized to control (n = 370) and intervention (n = 265) conditions and assessed at baseline hospitalization and follow-up at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) item-9 was used to evaluate patients for suicidal ideation. Mixed model regression was used to assess intervention versus control group changes in PHQ-9 item-9 scores over time and associations between baseline characteristics and development of suicidal ideation longitudinally. As part of the study implementation process assessment, suicide outreach call logs were also reviewed. Results: Over 50% of patients endorsed suicidal ideation at ≥1 assessment. Intervention patients relative to control patients demonstrated reductions in endorsements of suicidal ideation that did not achieve statistical significance (F[3, 1461] = 0.74, P = .53). The study team completed outreach phone calls, texts or voice messages to 268 patients with PHQ-9 item-9 scores ≥1 (n = 161 control, n = 107 intervention). Conclusions: Suicide assessment and monitoring can be feasibly implemented in large-scale pragmatic clinical trials. Intervention patients demonstrated less suicidal ideation over time; however, these comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. Intensive pragmatic trial monitoring may mask treatment effects by providing control patients a supportive intervention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02655354 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychiatry. Volume 85:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 85:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 85, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 85
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0085-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 29
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01-02
- Subjects:
- Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychiatry
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Periodicals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/upsy20#.VcNnKvlVhBc ↗
http://guilfordjournals.com/loi/psyc ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0033-2747;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=pr/jnps.htm&dir=periodicals/per_psych&cart_id= ↗
http://www.extenza-eps.com/extenza/contentviewing/viewJournal.do?journalId=167 ↗
http://www.guilford.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/00332747.2021.1991200 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-2747
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.260000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21069.xml