Leafhopper feeding behaviour on three grapevine cultivars with different susceptibilities to Flavescence dorée. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ripamonti, Matteo; Maron, Federico; Cornara, Daniele; Marzachì, Cristina; Fereres, Alberto; Bosco, Domenico
• Is Part Of: Journal of insect physiology. Volume 137(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: Scaphoideus titanus -- EPG -- Electrical Penetration Graph -- Vitis vinifera -- Cultivar; EPG Electrical Penetration Graph -- FD Flavescence dorée -- FDp Flavescence dorée phytoplasma; Insects -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Insectes -- Physiologie -- Périodiques; Insects -- Physiology; Periodicals; 571.157
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2022.104366
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1910

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Scaphoideus titanus feeding behavior on three grapevine varieties was described with EPG. A longer duration of phloem ingestion was recorded on Barbera cv. compared to Brachetto and Moscato. No major differences were identified in the phases outside the phloem among the three varieties. Barbera is a more suitable host-plant for the leafhopper compared to Brachetto and Moscato. The differences in feeding behavior may explain the different susceptibilities to Flavescence dorée. Abstract: Scaphoideus titanus (Ball) is a grapevine-feeder leafhopper, and the most important vector of Flavescence dorée of grapevine (FD), a disease associated with phytoplasmas belonging to ribosomal subgroups 16Sr-V–C and –D. FD is a major constraint to viticulture in several European countries and, so far, its control has relied on roguing of infected plants and insecticide applications against the vector. Detailed knowledge on different levels of the multifaceted phytoplasma-plant-vector relationship is required to envisage and explore more sustainable ways to control the disease spread. In the present work, S. titanus feeding behaviour was described on three grapevine cultivars: Barbera (susceptible to FD), Brachetto, and Moscato (tolerant to FD) using the Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) technique. Interestingly, no differences were highlighted in the non-phloem feeding phases, thus suggesting that the tested cultivars have no major differences in the biochemical composition or structure of the leaf cuticle, epidermis or mesophyll, that can affect the first feeding activities. On the contrary, the results showed significant differences in leafhopper feeding behaviour in terms of the duration of the phloem feeding phase, longer on Barbera and shorter on Brachetto and Moscato, and of the frequency of interruption-salivation events inside the phloem, higher on Brachetto and Moscato. These findings indicate a possible preference for the Barbera cultivar, a better host for the leafhopper. Scaphoideus titanus feeding behaviour on Barbera correlates with an enhanced FDp transmission efficiency, thus explaining, at least in part, the higher susceptibility of this cultivar to FD. The mechanisms for the possible non-preference for Brachetto and Moscato are discussed, and an antixenosis is hypothesized. We propose that breeding for resistance against FD should take into account both plant traits associated with the response to the phytoplasmas and to the vector.