Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial. Issue 7230 (29th January 2000)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kremer, Christian; Duffy, Sean; Moroney, Michelle
• Is Part Of: BMJ. Volume 320:Issue 7230(2000)
• Page Start: 279
• Page End: 282
• Publication Date: 2000-01-29
• Subjects: Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine; Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7230.279
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1447

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare outpatient hysteroscopy with day case hysteroscopy in terms of patient satisfaction and acceptability Setting: Gynaecology clinic of a teaching hospital. Participants: 100 women. Design and interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to outpatient hysteroscopy or day case hysteroscopy provided they had no preference for either procedure. Main outcome measures: Satisfaction rate, requirements for postoperative analgesia, speed of recovery, time away from home, and time off work Results: The outpatient group recovered preoperative fitness more quickly than the day case group (2 days (range 1-2.7) versus 3 days (2–4), P<0.05). After the procedure, the outpatient group were also fully mobile more quickly than the day case group (0 minutes (0–5) versus 105 minutes (80–120), P<0.001). Requirements for postoperative analgesia were similar in both groups. Overall, 78% of patients considered that the pain from outpatient hysteroscopy was less than that usually experienced during menstruation. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (83.6% in the outpatient group versus 77.0% in the day case group). Conclusions: Outpatient hysteroscopy and day case hysteroscopy were equally acceptable to patients. Patients recovered significantly more quickly from outpatient hysteroscopy than from day case hysteroscopy.