Dissemination of Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis of PRS and PRS-GO. Issue 3 (11th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nasser, Jacob S.; Billig, Jessica I.; Horiuchi, Sakura; Chung, Kevin C.
• Is Part Of: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 10:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: e3808
• Publication Date: 2022-03-11
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003808
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-7574

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS ) recently developed an open access counterpart, PRS Global Open (PRS-GO ), to increase dissemination of research in an efficient and widespread manner. We aimed to (1) examine the differences in the dissemination of research published in PRS and PRS-GO, and (2) identify differences in the authorship between the journals. Methods: We extracted data on Altmetric Attention Scores, article mentions, citations, and author characteristics using the Altmetric Explorer Database from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2020. We stratified research outputs into traditional dissemination and social media dissemination. Additionally, multivariable linear regression models were used to examine differences in dissemination between the journals. Results: A total of 1798 articles were included in the analysis ( PRS = 1031, PRS-GO = 767). The average Altmetric Attention Score was higher for PRS compared with PRS-GO ( PRS = 15.2, PRS-GO = 8.1). Articles in PRS had a greater Altmetric Attention Score (β-coefficient: 7.50, P < 0.001), higher measures of traditional dissemination (β-coefficient: 3.11, P < 0.001), and higher measures of social media dissemination than articles in PRS-GO (β-coefficient: 4.38, P = 0.73). Conclusions: Despite being an open access journal, PRS-GO had significantly fewer measures of social media and traditional dissemination compared with PRS . Given that numerous factors may influence the dissemination of scientific literature, it is imperative that publications identify specific ways to provide a fair advantage for both researchers and readers. Additional initiatives to engage readership for open access may include creative campaigns targeting an appropriate audience.