Sins of inquiry: How to criticize scientific pursuits. (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: DiMarco, Marina; Khalifa, Kareem
• Is Part Of: Studies in history and philosophy of science. Volume 92(2022)
• Page Start: 86
• Page End: 96
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: Pursuit -- Pursuitworthiness -- Criticism -- Apokritic norms -- Questions -- Inquiry; Science -- History -- Periodicals; Science -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 509
• DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0039-3681

Abstract

Abstract: Criticism is a staple of the scientific enterprise and of the social epistemology of science. Philosophical discussions of criticism have traditionally focused on its roles in relation to objectivity, confirmation, and theory choice. However, attention to criticism and to criticizability should also inform our thinking about scientific pursuits: the allocation of resources with the aim of developing scientific tools and ideas. In this paper, we offer an account of scientific pursuitworthiness which takes criticizability as its starting point. We call this the apokritic model of pursuit. Its core ideas are that pursuits are practices governed by norms for asking and answering questions, and that criticism arises from the breach of these norms. We illustrate and advertise our approach using examples from institutional grant review, neuroscience, and sociology. We show that the apokritic model can unify several indices of criticizability, that it can account for the importance of criticizing pursuits in scientific practice, and that it can offer ameliorative advice to erstwhile pursuers.