A seismic fragility model accounting for torsional irregularity in low‐rise non‐ductile RC moment‐resisting frames. (22nd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhasker, Rohan; Menon, Arun
• Is Part Of: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 51:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 912
• Page End: 934
• Publication Date: 2021-12-22
• Subjects: high‐dimensional model representation -- metamodel -- plan‐asymmetric buildings -- seismic fragility -- torsional irregularity; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3597
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-8847

Abstract

Abstract: Buildings characterized by torsional irregularity are notorious for their vulnerability to earthquakes. However, most fragility/vulnerability models used for regional seismic risk assessment fail to distinguish between buildings with torsionally balanced and unbalanced configurations. The present study aims to develop a seismic fragility model sensitive to torsional irregularity for low‐rise non‐ductile RC moment frame buildings. To this end, a numerical investigation centred on 13 three‐storied plan‐asymmetric models, each characterized by a distinct combination of normalized stiffness eccentricity, torsional radius to mass radius of gyration ratio and normalized strength eccentricity, is presented. Using high‐dimensional model representation (HDMR), a metamodel for the maximum inter‐storey drift under bi‐directional seismic action is calibrated, considering average spectral acceleration and the above trio of torsional irregularity descriptors (TIDs) as the predictor variables. Carrying out numerical simulations on limit state functions formulated using the above demand model and appropriate capacity thresholds, the seismic fragility is estimated. The parameters of a lognormal fragility function compatible with the above estimates are determined using the method of maximum likelihood. A strong correlation is observed between the TIDs and the fragility function parameters. This reinforces the importance of accounting for all three TIDs while rating the seismic fragility of a building. Using least‐square error minimization technique, a functional relationship is established between the fragility model parameters and the TIDs. The framework described herein provides a simple, yet rational means to develop the next generation of seismic fragility models accounting for one of the most critical factors governing seismic behaviour––'torsional irregularity'.