P041 Characterization of cytokine and drug concentrations in serum, mucosa and faeces during induction treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies. (21st January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Van Oostrom, J; Hanzel, J; Verstockt, B; Singh, S; Smith, J; Stylli, J; Vermeire, S; D'Haens, G
• Is Part Of: Journal of Crohn's and colitis. Volume 16(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: i157
• Page End: i158
• Publication Date: 2022-01-21
• Subjects: Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344005
• DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.170
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1873-9946

Abstract

Abstract: Background: It remains unclear why up to 30% of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to anti-TNF treatment (anti-TNF). In this study, we explored multi compartment cytokine and anti-TNF concentrations in peripheral blood (PB), faeces (F) and colonic mucosa (CM) before, during and after anti-TNF induction treatment in UC. Methods: 91 UC patients starting infliximab or adalimumab were included at two tertiary centres (table 1). Patients underwent clinical and endoscopic assessment with CM, PB, and F sampling at baseline. Follow-up CM samples were taken at first follow-up endoscopy during the first year. Follow-up PB and F samples were taken at follow-up endoscopy and optionally on day 3, 7, 14, and 28. Response (R) was defined as Mayo endoscopic score (MES) 0–1 (assessed by a blinded independent reader) and subsequent anti-TNF therapy for > 1 year. All other patients were classified as non-responders (NR). TNFα, IL6, IL10 and drug levels were measured in all compartments and OSM and IL12p40 in PB and CM (F anti-TNF with ELISA and cytokines and PB and CM anti-TNF with a bead-based immunoassay). CM samples were normalised for gram of protein (gop). To differentiate pharmacokinetic (PK) from pharmacodynamic (PD) failures, we calculated CM anti-TNF/ TNFα. We classified values above the median as sufficient PK (Good PK) and values below as insufficient PK (Bad PK). Results: We analysed CM, PB and F samples from 71, 91 and 32 patients respectively. Baseline cytokine concentrations were similar in all compartments. At follow-up (table 2), PB IL6 was lower in R (p=0.045). All F cytokines were significantly higher in R (TNFα: p<0.001; IL6: p<0.001; IL10: p<0.001). In CM, IL6 and OSM were lower and IL12p40 higher in R (IL6: p=0.004; OSM: p=0.01; IL12p40: p=0.021). After stratification of CM samples for PK readouts (table 3, figure 1), IL6 was highest in Good PK NR vs Good PK R (6905 vs 2980 ng/gop, p = 0.002) and OSM was lowest in R vs NR groups (2466 vs 36111 ng/gop in Good PK R vs Good PK NR, p = 0.002). Trends were observed towards highest IL10 in Bad PK R and Highest IL12p40 in Good PK R, although not significant. Conclusion: Baseline cytokine concentrations in PB, CM and F did not predict response to anti-TNF induction treatment in UC. At follow-up, response (R) was characterised by lower PB IL6; higher F cytokines; lower CM IL6 and OSM and higher IL12p40. After stratification for PK, pharmacodynamic failure (Good PK NR) was characterised by highest CM IL6, indicating it is a driver to inflammation alternative to anti-TNF. R was characterised by lowest OSM regardless of PK, indicating OSM mainly reflects disease activity. Further research focuses on cytokine-PK interplay contributing to anti-TNF (non-) response.