Comprehensive nodal breast VMAT: solving the low‐dose wash dilemma using an iterative knowledge‐based radiotherapy planning solution. Issue 1 (12th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stanton, Cameron; Bell, Linda J.; Le, Andrew; Griffiths, Brooke; Wu, Kenny; Adams, Jessica; Ambrose, Leigh; Andree‐Evarts, Denise; Porter, Brian; Bromley, Regina; van Gysen, Kirsten; Morgia, Marita; Lamoury, Gillian; Eade, Thomas; Booth, Jeremy T.; Carroll, Susan
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical radiation sciences. Volume 69:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 85
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2021-08-12
• Subjects: Breast -- cancer -- knowledge‐based planning -- lymph nodes -- radiotherapy -- simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) -- VMAT; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australia -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- New Zealand -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.534
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-3895

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Aimed to develop a simple and robust volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) solution for comprehensive lymph node (CLN) breast cancer without increase in low‐dose wash. Methods: Forty CLN‐breast patient data sets were utilised to develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) VMAT model, which limits low‐dose wash using iterative learning and base‐tangential methods as benchmark. Another twenty data sets were employed to validate the model comparing KBP‐generated ipsilateral VMAT (ipsi‐VMAT) plans against the benchmarked hybrid (h)‐VMAT (departmental standard) and bowtie‐VMAT (published best practice) methods. Planning target volume (PTV), conformity/homogeneity index (CI/HI), organ‐at‐risk (OAR), remaining‐volume‐at‐risk (RVR) and blinded radiation oncologist (RO) plan preference were evaluated. Results: Ipsi‐ and bowtie‐VMAT plans were dosimetrically equivalent, achieving greater nodal target coverage ( P < 0.05) compared to h‐VMAT with minor reduction in breast coverage. CI was enhanced for a small reduction in breast HI with improved dose sparing to ipsilateral‐lung and humeral head ( P < 0.05) at immaterial expense to spinal cord. Significantly, low‐dose wash to OARs and RVR were comparable between all plan types demonstrating a simple VMAT class solution robust to patient‐specific anatomic variation can be applied to CLN breast without need for complex beam modification (hybrid plans, avoidance sectors or other). This result was supported by blinded RO review. Conclusions: A simple and robust ipsilateral VMAT class solution for CLN breast generated using iterative KBP modelling can achieve clinically acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing without unwanted increase in low‐dose wash associated with increased second malignancy risk. Abstract : Comprehensive lymph nodal (CLN) radiotherapy can improve the outcomes for advanced breast cancer patients, but it can be particularly challenging to balance target coverage and organ‐at‐risk sparing without complex beam modification (VMAT avoidance sectors, hybrid IMRT/VMAT fields, other) to limit the low‐dose wash and potential second malignancy risk. By presenting the first application of iterative learning to a knowledge‐based planning model in CLN‐breast radiotherapy, this study demonstrates that a simple and robust ipsilateral VMAT class solution can be applied without increase in low‐dose wash compared to benchmark base‐tangential IMRT/VMAT methods.