Psychological need-supportive instruction improves novel skill performance, intrinsic motivation, and enjoyment: a cluster-randomised study. Issue 1 (2nd January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Manninen, Mika; Deng, Yangyang; Hwang, Yongju; Waller, Sophie; Yli-Piipari, Sami
• Is Part Of: International journal of sport and exercise psychology. Volume 20:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 122
• Page End: 146
• Publication Date: 2022-01-02
• Subjects: Autonomy -- self-determination theory -- motor skills -- motor competency; Sports -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques; Exercise -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; 796.019
• DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2020.1826999
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1612-197X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study aimed, first, to test the efficacy of the self-determination theory -centred need-supportive instruction on motivation, novel skill performance, enjoyment, and state anxiety, and second, to test whether the intervention impact followed the theoretical stipulation of the theory. A sample of 59 college undergraduate students ( M = 20.26 ± 1.90; 75% female) was allocated to either a need-supportive or –depriving condition. Motivational regulations, skill performance in juggling, enjoyment, and state anxiety were measured before and after the 5 × 45 min trial. The covariates assessed were the time of the condition, gender, trait anxiety, causality orientations, and task interest. The intervention had a statistically significant between-group effect on intrinsic motivation ( F (1, 49) = 5.52, p < .023, η 2 = .10), skill performance ( F (1, 48) = 9.23, p = .004, η 2 = 0.16), and enjoyment ( F (1, 49) = 4.89, p = .032, η 2 = .09), but no differences in other motivational regulations or state anxiety were detected. In addition, the path analysis showed a positive motivational pathway, with the intervention impacting intrinsic motivation ( β = .55), integrated regulation ( β = .30) and amotivation ( β = −.27), which impacted positively skill performance ( R 2 = .42) and enjoyment ( R 2 = .58). It can be concluded that need-supportive instruction is beneficial in improving participants' intrinsic motivation, skill performance, and enjoyment when compared to need-depriving instruction. Autonomous motivation and an absence of amotivation toward the task seem to instrumental mediators between the need-supportive intervention and novel skill performance and enjoyment.