The Racial Landscape of Fintech Mortgage Lending. Issue 2 (4th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Haupert, Tyler
• Is Part Of: Housing policy debate. Volume 32:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 337
• Page End: 368
• Publication Date: 2022-03-04
• Subjects: fintech lending -- mortgages -- subprime lending -- racial disparities -- neighborhoods; Housing policy -- United States -- Periodicals; Housing -- United States -- Finance -- Periodicals; Housing policy; Public housing -- Finance; United States; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.58097305
• DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1825010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-1482

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Little is known about racial patterns in fintech mortgage lending, despite evidence of racial disparities in the broader mortgage market. This study leverages 2015–2017 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data to assess disparities in lending outcomes between White and non-White applicants and between neighborhoods of varying racial composition in the United States' 200 largest metropolitan areas at fintech and traditional lenders. Results of a series of binary logistic regression models suggest disparities in rates of loan approvals between White and similarly qualified non-White applicants are substantively small overall, but lower at fintech lenders relative to traditional lenders, most substantially for Latinos. Non-White applicants are more likely to receive subprime terms relative to similarly qualified White applicants at both lender types, and disparities in rates of subprime loan receipt between Black and similarly qualified White applicants are greater at fintech lenders than traditional lenders. Neighborhood racial composition has a mixed but substantively small impact on approval rates at both lender types. However, both lender types distribute subprime credit to non-White neighborhoods at significantly higher rates than to White neighborhoods. Findings suggest fintech lending contributes to racial and spatial disparities in subprime mortgage lending and warrants increased scrutiny from regulators.