The use of patient experience survey data by out-of-hours primary care services: a qualitative interview study. Issue 11 (21st October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barry, Heather E; Campbell, John L; Asprey, Anthea; Richards, Suzanne H
• Is Part Of: BMJ quality & safety. Volume 25:Issue 11(2016)
• Page Start: 851
• Page End: 859
• Publication Date: 2015-10-21
• Subjects: Primary care -- Qualitative research -- Health services research -- Patient satisfaction; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 362.106805
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003963
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-5415

Abstract

Abstract : Background: English National Quality Requirements mandate out-of-hours primary care services to routinely audit patient experience, but do not state how it should be done. Objectives: We explored how providers collect patient feedback data and use it to inform service provision. We also explored staff views on the utility of out-of-hours questions from the English General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS). Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 31 staff (comprising service managers, general practitioners and administrators) from 11 out-of-hours primary care providers in England, UK. Staff responsible for patient experience audits within their service were sampled and data collected via face-to-face semistructured interviews. Results: Although most providers regularly audited their patients' experiences by using patient surveys, many participants expressed a strong preference for additional qualitative feedback. Staff provided examples of small changes to service delivery resulting from patient feedback, but service-wide changes were not instigated. Perceptions that patients lacked sufficient understanding of the urgent care system in which out-of-hours primary care services operate were common and a barrier to using feedback to enable change. Participants recognised the value of using patient experience feedback to benchmark services, but perceived weaknesses in the out-of-hours items from the GPPS led them to question the validity of using these data for benchmarking in its current form. Conclusions: The lack of clarity around how out-of-hours providers should audit patient experience hinders the utility of the National Quality Requirements. Although surveys were common, patient feedback data had only a limited role in service change. Data derived from the GPPS may be used to benchmark service providers, but refinement of the out-of-hours items is needed.