Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study. Issue 6 (17th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Restall, Gayle; Michaud, Valerie; Walker, John R; Waldman, Celeste; Bernstein, Charles N; Park, Jason; Wittmeier, Kristy; Singh, Harminder
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Volume 3:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 249
• Page End: 256
• Publication Date: 2019-06-17
• Subjects: Patient education -- Patient experience -- Quality -- Service delivery; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwz016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-2084

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Patient perspectives have important roles in improving the quality of colonoscopy services. The purpose of this qualitative study was to obtain the perspectives of patients who recently had undergone colonoscopy procedures, about their experiences with bowel preparation, the procedure itself, and communication of follow-up results and recommendations. Methods: We recruited adults who had undergone a colonoscopy, to participate in semistructured interviews. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analyzed using inductive qualitative methods. Results: Twenty-four adults (58% female) with an average age of 53.8 years participated. Results were categorized within the themes of bowel preparation, the colonoscopy procedure and communication of the results. Participants appreciated having clear consistent plain language messages about bowel preparation. Some participants experienced additional challenges to understanding, and navigating, colonoscopy procedures. At the time of the procedure, positive and reassuring interactions with, and between, members of the health care team, in addition to management of physical pain and discomfort, were important. Participants wanted clear and timely information about the results of their test. Conclusions: Understanding patients' needs for information and support can promote higher quality colonoscopy services. Our findings suggest that quality indicators should include: patients' perspectives of the clarity of bowel instructions; the need for supports that are not routinely provided; the extent to which concerns about the procedure are addressed; interactions with the endoscopy team; the endoscopy team's interactions with each other; comfort during the procedure, and the timeliness and clarity of results and follow-up instructions. These indicators should be included in annual patient surveys.