A prospective comparison of echocardiographic wall motion score index and radionuclide ejection fraction in predicting outcome following acute myocardial infarction. Issue 3 (1st September 2001)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Galasko, G I W; Basu, S; Lahiri, A; Senior, R
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 86:Issue 3(2001)
• Page Start: 271
• Page End: 276
• Publication Date: 2001-09-01
• Subjects: echocardiographic wall motion score index -- radionuclide ventriculography -- prognosis -- acute myocardial infarction; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.3.271
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To characterise echocardiographic wall motion score index (WMSI) as a surrogate measure of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to compare its prognostic value with that of EF measured by radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). DESIGN: A prospective study to compare baseline echocardiographic WMSI with RNV EF in consecutive patients thrombolysed for AMI, both performed on the same day before discharge, and their relative prognostic values in predicting cardiac events. SETTING: District general hospital coronary care unit and cardiology department. PATIENTS: 120 consecutive patients free of exclusion criteria thrombolysed for AMI and followed up for a mean (SD) of 13 (10) months. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses plus cardiac event rates at follow up between RNV EF and echocardiographic WMSI. RESULTS: WMSI correlated well with RNV EF. The best corresponding WMSIs for EFs 45%, 40%, and 35% were 0.6, 0.8, and 1.1, respectively. There were 42 cardiac events during follow up. Although both RNV EF and WMSI were strong univariate predictors of cardiac events, only WMSI independently predicted outcome in a multivariate model. All three WMSI cut offs significantly predicted events, while an RNV EF cut off of ⩽ 45% v > 45% failed to reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Although both RNV and echocardiographic WMSI strongly predicted cardiac outcome, WMSI, a cheaper and more readily available technique, is more discriminatory, especially in cases of mild left ventricular dysfunction following AMI.