Association between ibrutinib treatment and hypertension. Issue 6 (1st July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Dae Hyun; Hawk, Fahad; Seok, Kieun; Gliksman, Matthew; Emole, Josephine; Rhea, Isaac B; Viganego, Federico; Welter-Frost, Allan; Armanious, Merna; Shah, Bijal; Chavez, Juliio C; Pinilla-Ibarz, Javier; Schabath, Matthew B; Fradley, Michael
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 108:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: 445
• Page End: 450
• Publication Date: 2021-07-01
• Subjects: outcome assessment -- health care -- drug monitoring -- hypertension; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319110
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor most commonly associated with atrial fibrillation. However, additional cardiotoxicities have been identified, including accelerated hypertension. The incidence and risk factors of new or worsening hypertension following ibrutinib treatment are not as well known. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 144 patients diagnosed with B cell malignancies treated with ibrutinib (n=93) versus conventional chemoimmunotherapy (n=51) and evaluated their effects on blood pressure at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics for each treatment group. Fisher's exact test was used to identify covariates significantly associated with the development of hypertension. Repeated measures analyses were conducted to analyse longitudinal blood pressure changes. Results: Both treatments had similar prevalence of baseline hypertension at 63.4% and 66.7%, respectively. There were no differences between treatments by age, sex and baseline cardiac comorbidities. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly increased over time with ibrutinib compared with baseline, whereas conventional chemoimmunotherapy was not associated with significant changes in blood pressure. Baseline hypertensive status did not affect the degree of blood pressure change over time. A significant increase in systolic blood pressure (defined as more than 10 mm Hg) was noted for ibrutinib (36.6%) compared with conventional chemoimmunotherapy (7.9%) at 1 month after treatment initiation. Despite being hypertensive at follow-up, 61.2% of patients who were treated with ibrutinib did not receive adequate blood pressure management (increase or addition of blood pressure medications). Within the ibrutinib group, of patients who developed more than 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure, only 52.9% had hypertension management changes. Conclusions: Ibrutinib is associated with the development of hypertension and worsening of blood pressure. Cardiologists and oncologists must be aware of this cardiotoxicity to allow timely management of blood pressure elevations.