Emerging Powers and Differentiation in Global Climate Institutions. (17th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thompson, Alexander
• Other Names: Kruck Andreas guestEditor.; Zangl Bernhard guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Global policy. Volume 11(2020)Supplement 3
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2020-11-17
• Subjects: Globalization -- Periodicals; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 327.1705
• DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12883
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-5880

Abstract

Abstract: The Paris Agreement on climate change brought states from the North and South together under a common framework to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. This was a remarkable institutional adjustment for a regime that had always maintained a strict distinction between developed and developing countries and imposed meaningful obligations only on the former. To better understand this change, I look at the negotiations surrounding the issue of 'differentiation'. The rising emissions of the emerging economies created a demand for institutional change on the part of key industrialized countries; however, they faced resistance from the increasingly assertive BASIC group (Brazil, South Africa, India and China). The challengers ultimately adopted strategic cooptation as their main negotiation strategy, offering compromises in the areas of climate finance and the legal form of new commitments. The climate case sheds light on the impact of power shifts in the domain of global environmental governance and illustrates that calls for change sometime comes from established rather than rising powers. Abstract : As coalitions shift, and as the urgency and uneven impacts of climate change inexorably reveal themselves, there will be new demands for ambitious action accompanied by new debates over differentiation in climate institutions.