Bi-level allocation of carbon emission permits based on clustering analysis and weighted voting: A case study in China. (15th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Feng, Zhiying; Tang, Wenhu; Niu, Zhewen; Wu, Qinghua
• Is Part Of: Applied energy. Volume 228(2018)
• Page Start: 1122
• Page End: 1135
• Publication Date: 2018-10-15
• Subjects: Carbon emission permits -- Clustering analysis -- Weighted voting model -- Multi-index comprehensive evaluation; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy conservation -- Periodicals; Energy conversion -- Periodicals; 621.042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-2619

Abstract

Highlights: A novel bi-level allocation scheme of carbon emission permits is proposed. This scheme considers pressure, capacity, responsibility and potential. 30 regions are clustered into 4 classes based on carbon emission characteristics. The schemes based on historical emissions, population and GDP are considered. It balances the scheme selections of each region using a weighted voting model. Abstract: A rational regional allocation scheme of carbon emission permits is important for establishing the nationwide carbon emission trading system (ETS) of China. Considering the vast area and great regional differences in China, a novel bi-level allocation scheme based on clustering analysis and a weighted voting model is proposed in this research. At the first level, 30 regions in China are clustered into four classes according to their characteristics of carbon emissions, which include emission reduction pressure, capacity, responsibility and potential. Then the total carbon emission permits are allocated to each class of regions. At the second level, carbon emission permits are allocated to each province (municipality) within a class. The weighted voting models are developed for both the two levels, where the allocation schemes based on historical emissions, population and GDP are selected by each region according to the different voting rights of each region. The voting rights of each region for choosing its inclined scheme are quantified through a multi-index comprehensive evaluation, which employs the entropy method at the first level due to the lack of prior knowledge and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) at the second level to increase policy flexibility. The combination of subjective weighting evaluation method (AHP) and objective weighting evaluation method (the entropy method) increases the flexibility of the abatement policy while guaranteeing the objectivity of decision-making process. Case studies of the allocation for carbon emission permits in China by 2020 and 2030 are carried out under the proposed allocation scheme. The derived allocation results show that the proposed allocation scheme can provide a balanced consideration to equality and efficiency, which are compared with those in reported literatures. The proposed allocation scheme can not only encourage all regions to reduce carbon emission intensity, but also achieve in meeting the carbon emission demand of the population in each region.