High resolution age-structured mapping of childhood vaccination coverage in low and middle income countries. Issue 12 (14th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Utazi, C. Edson; Thorley, Julia; Alegana, Victor A.; Ferrari, Matthew J.; Takahashi, Saki; Metcalf, C. Jessica E.; Lessler, Justin; Tatem, Andrew J.
• Is Part Of: Vaccine. Volume 36:Issue 12(2018)
• Page Start: 1583
• Page End: 1591
• Publication Date: 2018-03-14
• Subjects: Measles vaccine -- Demographic and Health Surveys -- Bayesian geostatistics -- Coverage heterogeneities; Vaccines -- Periodicals; 615.372
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.020
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-410X

Abstract

Highlights: Geostatistical models showing strong predictive performance are used to produce maps of measles vaccination coverage at 1 × 1 km resolution. Remoteness, measured as travel time to nearest major settlement, was consistently a key predictor of coverage. The maps reveal heterogeneities and 'coldspots' of low vaccination coverage that are missed using large area summaries. Aggregated estimates of coverage that do not account for local heterogeneities potentially over-estimate the numbers of children vaccinated by over 10%. Relating to the WHO GVAP targets of 80% coverage, the integration of high resolution coverage and population maps shows the districts that have attained the threshold in the study countries. Abstract: Background: The expansion of childhood vaccination programs in low and middle income countries has been a substantial public health success story. Indicators of the performance of intervention programmes such as coverage levels and numbers covered are typically measured through national statistics or at the scale of large regions due to survey design, administrative convenience or operational limitations. These mask heterogeneities and 'coldspots' of low coverage that may allow diseases to persist, even if overall coverage is high. Hence, to decrease inequities and accelerate progress towards disease elimination goals, fine-scale variation in coverage should be better characterized. Methods: Using measles as an example, cluster-level Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data were used to map vaccination coverage at 1 km spatial resolution in Cambodia, Mozambique and Nigeria for varying age-group categories of children under five years, using Bayesian geostatistical techniques built on a suite of publicly available geospatial covariates and implemented via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Results: Measles vaccination coverage was found to be strongly predicted by just 4–5 covariates in geostatistical models, with remoteness consistently selected as a key variable. The output 1 × 1 km maps revealed significant heterogeneities within the three countries that were not captured using province-level summaries. Integration with population data showed that at the time of the surveys, few districts attained the 80% coverage, that is one component of the WHO Global Vaccine Action Plan 2020 targets. Conclusion: The elimination of vaccine-preventable diseases requires a strong evidence base to guide strategies and inform efficient use of limited resources. The approaches outlined here provide a route to moving beyond large area summaries of vaccination coverage that mask epidemiologically-important heterogeneities to detailed maps that capture subnational vulnerabilities. The output datasets are built on open data and methods, and in flexible format that can be aggregated to more operationally-relevant administrative unit levels.