A method for determining the optimal delivered hydrogen pressure for fuel cell electric vehicles. (15th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lin, Zhenhong; Ou, Shiqi; Elgowainy, Amgad; Reddi, Krishna; Veenstra, Mike; Verduzco, Laura
• Is Part Of: Applied energy. Volume 216(2018)
• Page Start: 183
• Page End: 194
• Publication Date: 2018-04-15
• Subjects: ALC Average & Long Commute -- ASC Average & Short Commute -- DHP delivered hydrogen pressure -- FLC Frequent & Long Commute -- FSC Frequent & Short Commute -- FCEVs Fuel cell electric vehicles -- HOP Hydrogen Optimal Pressure -- MLC Moderate & Long Commute -- MSC Moderate & Short Commute -- NWP nominal working pressure -- ZEV Zero Emissions Vehicles; Fuel cell electric vehicle -- Hydrogen refueling station -- On-board storage -- Optimization -- Driving range -- Hydrogen fueling pressure; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy conservation -- Periodicals; Energy conversion -- Periodicals; 621.042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.041
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-2619

Abstract

Highlights: A 700 bar DHP is a robustly better choice for most circumstances. 300 or 500 bar can be recommended in some Cluster Strategy circumstances. Tradeoffs among station utilization, availability and pressure are necessary. Even higher pressures (>700 bar) are desirable if technologically viable. Consumer heterogeneity is an important factor. Abstract: Fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are considered an important part of a portfolio of options to address challenges in the transportation sector, including energy security and pollution reduction. The market success of FCEVs depends on standardization of key vehicle and infrastructure parameters, including the delivered hydrogen pressure (DHP). This study developed and utilized the Hydrogen Optimal Pressure (HOP) model to systematically identify the optimal DHP among 350, 500, and 700 bar toward the lowest total consumer cost and analyze how the optimal DHP may be affected by attributes of drivers, vehicles, and hydrogen refueling stations. The DHP of 700 bar a robustly better choice than 350 bar or 500 bar for Region Strategy, regardless of fuel availability, FCEV adoption, driver types, time values, and fuel economies. A DHP of 300 or 500 bar can the winner in Cluster Strategy if combined with certain assumptions of driving patterns and time value. the optimal pressure is found to be very sensitive to fuel availability, fuel economy, driving pattern and time value. The appeal of a higher DHP such as 700 bar (or even higher) is more obvious during the early market stages, when the number of hydrogen stations is limited and early FCEV consumers likely have higher time value, and thus may be willing to pay more for the increased range with higher DHP. Future research on mixed DHPs within a station and across stations is suggested.