Impact of coronary calcification on outcomes after ABSORB scaffold implantation: insights from the GABI-R registry. Issue 7 (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of coronary calcification on outcomes after ABSORB scaffold implantation: insights from the GABI-R registry. Issue 7 (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Impact of coronary calcification on outcomes after ABSORB scaffold implantation
- Authors:
- Hemetsberger, Rayyan
Abdelghani, Mohammad
Mankerious, Nader
Allali, Abdelhakim
Toelg, Ralph
Gori, Tommaso
Achenbach, Stephan
Riemer, Thomas
Mehilli, Julinda
Nef, Holger M.
Naber, Christoph
Wöhrle, Jochen
Zahn, Ralf
Kastner, Johannes
Schmermund, Axel
Hamm, Christian
Münzel, Thomas
Richardt, Gert - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To investigate the outcomes after bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) implantation in calcified coronary lesions. In calcified coronary lesions, durable metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to noncalcified lesions. Although not recommended, BRSs were frequently implanted in calcified lesions in clinical practice. Their outcome is not well investigated. Methods: Between November 2013 and January 2016, 3326 patients were enrolled in the German-Austrian ABSORB ReglstRy (GABI-R). Lesion calcification severity was classified into no ( n = 1144), mild ( n = 1306), and moderate-to-severe ( n = 690) calcification. Results: Patients with calcification were older (none: 59.1 ± 11.2 vs. mild: 61.6 ± 10.9 vs. moderate to severe: 62.4 ± 10.5 years, P < 0.001), had more diabetes (19.1 vs. 20.8 vs. 23.9%, P = 0.015), and more often had previous myocardial infarction (MI) (19.3 vs. 23.1 vs. 25.4%, P = 0.002). Despite a higher rate of postdilatations ( P < 0.001), lesions with calcification had more residual stenosis (2.05 ± 9.36% vs. 3.11 ± 9.36% vs. 3.89 ± 9.39%, P < 0.001). Consequently, procedural success was achieved in 97.7 vs. 96.2 vs. 93.6% of cases in none, mild, and moderate-to-severe calcification ( P < 0.001). At 24 months, cardiac death (0.3 vs. 0.7 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.009) was higher with increasing calcification. However, no significant between-group difference was observed in the incidence ofAbstract : Objective: To investigate the outcomes after bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) implantation in calcified coronary lesions. In calcified coronary lesions, durable metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to noncalcified lesions. Although not recommended, BRSs were frequently implanted in calcified lesions in clinical practice. Their outcome is not well investigated. Methods: Between November 2013 and January 2016, 3326 patients were enrolled in the German-Austrian ABSORB ReglstRy (GABI-R). Lesion calcification severity was classified into no ( n = 1144), mild ( n = 1306), and moderate-to-severe ( n = 690) calcification. Results: Patients with calcification were older (none: 59.1 ± 11.2 vs. mild: 61.6 ± 10.9 vs. moderate to severe: 62.4 ± 10.5 years, P < 0.001), had more diabetes (19.1 vs. 20.8 vs. 23.9%, P = 0.015), and more often had previous myocardial infarction (MI) (19.3 vs. 23.1 vs. 25.4%, P = 0.002). Despite a higher rate of postdilatations ( P < 0.001), lesions with calcification had more residual stenosis (2.05 ± 9.36% vs. 3.11 ± 9.36% vs. 3.89 ± 9.39%, P < 0.001). Consequently, procedural success was achieved in 97.7 vs. 96.2 vs. 93.6% of cases in none, mild, and moderate-to-severe calcification ( P < 0.001). At 24 months, cardiac death (0.3 vs. 0.7 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.009) was higher with increasing calcification. However, no significant between-group difference was observed in the incidence of target vessel MI, target vessel revascularization, or target lesion failure. The rate of probable scaffold thrombosis was significantly higher with increasing calcification. Conclusion: In GABI-R, ABSORB scaffolds in calcified lesions required more postdilation, led to more residual stenosis, but did not portend increased target lesion revascularization over 2 years. Nevertheless, coronary calcification severity emerged as a cardiovascular risk marker and was predictive of cardiovascular mortality. Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02066623. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Coronary artery disease. Volume 31:Issue 7(2020:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Coronary artery disease
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 7(2020:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 7 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0031-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- ABSORB -- bioresorbable vascular scaffold -- coronary calcification -- GABI-R
Coronary heart disease -- Periodicals
Coronary Disease -- Indexes
Coronary Disease -- Periodicals
616.123005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019501-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.coronary-artery.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000870 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0954-6928
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3472.049000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20917.xml