Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection. Issue 5 (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection. Issue 5 (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection
- Authors:
- Raptis, Dimitri A.
Sánchez-Velázquez, Patricia
Machairas, Nikolaos
Sauvanet, Alain
Rueda de Leon, Alexandra
Oba, Atsushi
Groot Koerkamp, Bas
Lovasik, Brendan
Chan, Carlos
Yeo, Charles J.
Bassi, Claudio
Ferrone, Cristina R.
Kooby, David
Moskal, David
Tamburrino, Domenico
Yoon, Dong-Sup
Barroso, Eduardo
de Santibañes, Eduardo
Kauffmann, Emanuele F.
Vigia, Emanuel
Robin, Fabien
Casciani, Fabio
Burdío, Fernando
Belfiori, Giulio
Malleo, Giuseppe
Lavu, Harish
Hartog, Hermien
Hwang, Ho Kyuong
Han, Ho-Seong
Poves, Ignasi
Rosado, Ismael Domínguez
Park, Joon-Seong
Lillemoe, Keith D.
Roberts, Keith J.
Sulpice, Laurent
Besselink, Marc G.
Abuawwad, Mahmoud
Del Chiaro, Marco
de Santibañes, Martin
Falconi, Massimo
D'Silva, Mizelle
Silva, Michael
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
Qadan, Motaz
Sell, Naomi M.
Beghdadi, Nassiba
Napoli, Niccolò
Busch, Olivier R. C.
Mazza, Oscar
Muiesan, Paolo
Müller, Philip C.
Ravikumar, Reena
Schulick, Richard
Powell-Brett, Sarah
Abbas, Syed Hussain
Mackay, Tara M.
Stoop, Thomas F.
Gallagher, Tom K.
Boggi, Ugo
van Eijck, Casper
Clavien, Pierre-Alain
Conlon, Kevin C. P.
Fusai, Giuseppe Kito
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to establish clinically relevant outcome benchmark values using criteria for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) from a low-risk cohort managed in high-volume centers. Summary Background Data: PD with PVR is regarded as the standard of care in patients with cancer involvement of the portomesenteric venous axis. There are, however, no benchmark outcome indicators for this population which hampers comparisons of patients undergoing PD with and without PVR resection. Methods: This multicenter study analyzed patients undergoing PD with any type of PVR in 23 high-volume centers from 2009 to 2018. Nineteen outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of the centers (NCT04053998). Results: Out of 1462 patients with PD and PVR, 840 (58%) formed the benchmark cohort, with a mean age was 64 (SD11) years, 413 (49%) were females. Benchmark cutoffs, among others, were calculated as follows: Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery): ⩽14%; in-hospital mortality rate: ⩽4%; major complication rate Grade≥3 and the CCI up to 6 months postoperatively: ⩽36% and ⩽26, respectively; portal vein thrombosis rate: ⩽14% and 5-year survival for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: ≥9%. Conclusion: These novel benchmark cutoffs targeting surgical performance, morbidity, mortality, andAbstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to establish clinically relevant outcome benchmark values using criteria for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) from a low-risk cohort managed in high-volume centers. Summary Background Data: PD with PVR is regarded as the standard of care in patients with cancer involvement of the portomesenteric venous axis. There are, however, no benchmark outcome indicators for this population which hampers comparisons of patients undergoing PD with and without PVR resection. Methods: This multicenter study analyzed patients undergoing PD with any type of PVR in 23 high-volume centers from 2009 to 2018. Nineteen outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of the centers (NCT04053998). Results: Out of 1462 patients with PD and PVR, 840 (58%) formed the benchmark cohort, with a mean age was 64 (SD11) years, 413 (49%) were females. Benchmark cutoffs, among others, were calculated as follows: Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery): ⩽14%; in-hospital mortality rate: ⩽4%; major complication rate Grade≥3 and the CCI up to 6 months postoperatively: ⩽36% and ⩽26, respectively; portal vein thrombosis rate: ⩽14% and 5-year survival for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: ≥9%. Conclusion: These novel benchmark cutoffs targeting surgical performance, morbidity, mortality, and oncological parameters show relatively inferior results in patients undergoing vascular resection because of involvement of the portomesenteric venous axis. These benchmark values however can be used to conclusively assess the results of different centers or surgeons operating on this high-risk group. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 272:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 272:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 272, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 272
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0272-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- benchmarking -- CCI -- comprehensive complication index -- morbidity -- mortality -- pancreatic cancer -- panrcreaticoduodenectomy -- portal vein resection -- survival
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004267 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20918.xml