Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with 18F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot. Issue 132 (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with 18F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot. Issue 132 (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with 18F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot
- Authors:
- Diez, Ana I. Garcia
Fuster, David
Morata, Laura
Torres, Ferran
Garcia, Ruben
Poggio, Daniel
Sotes, Santiago
Del Amo, Montserrat
Isern-Kebschull, Jaime
Pomes, Jaume
Soriano, Alex
Brugnara, Laura
Tomas, Xavier - Abstract:
- Highlights: Functional MR parameters are useful for differentiation between DFO and CN. Functional MR measurements with large ROIs provide more reliable results. 18 F-FDG PET/CT showed greater diagnostic performance than functional MRI. 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a good imaging tool when nuclear medicine studies are required. Abstract: Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) involving two region of interest (ROI) sizes with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) to differentiate diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN). Method: Thirty-one diabetic patients were included in this prospective study. Two readers independently evaluated DWI (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] and high-b-value signal pathological-to-normal bone ratio [DWIr]) and DCE-MRI parameters ( K trans, Kep, Ve, internal area under the gadolinium curve at 60 s [iAUC60 ] and time intensity curve [TIC]) using two different ROI sizes, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters (visual assessment, SUVmax, delayed SUVmax, and percentage changes between SUVmax and delayed SUVmax ). Techniques were compared by univariate analysis using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]. Reliability was analyzed with Kappa and Intraclass correlation [ICC]. Results: DWIr, K trans and iAUC60 showed better diagnostic accuracyHighlights: Functional MR parameters are useful for differentiation between DFO and CN. Functional MR measurements with large ROIs provide more reliable results. 18 F-FDG PET/CT showed greater diagnostic performance than functional MRI. 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a good imaging tool when nuclear medicine studies are required. Abstract: Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) involving two region of interest (ROI) sizes with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) to differentiate diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN). Method: Thirty-one diabetic patients were included in this prospective study. Two readers independently evaluated DWI (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] and high-b-value signal pathological-to-normal bone ratio [DWIr]) and DCE-MRI parameters ( K trans, Kep, Ve, internal area under the gadolinium curve at 60 s [iAUC60 ] and time intensity curve [TIC]) using two different ROI sizes, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters (visual assessment, SUVmax, delayed SUVmax, and percentage changes between SUVmax and delayed SUVmax ). Techniques were compared by univariate analysis using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]. Reliability was analyzed with Kappa and Intraclass correlation [ICC]. Results: DWIr, K trans and iAUC60 showed better diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.814−0.830) and reliability (ICC > 0.9) for large than for small ROIs (AUC = 0.736−0.750; ICC = 0.6 in K trans, 0.8 in DWIr and iAUC60 ). TIC showed moderate diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.739−0.761) and reliability (κ 0.7). Visual assessment of 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy (AUC = 0.924) than MRI parameters. Semi-quantitative 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not provide significant improvement over visual analysis (AUC = 0.848−0.903). Conclusion: DWIr, K trans and iAUC60 allowed reliable differentiation of DFO and CN, particularly for large ROIs. Visual assessment of 18 F-FDG PET/CT was the most accurate technique for differentiation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of radiology. Issue 132(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of radiology
- Issue:
- Issue 132(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 132, Issue 132 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 132
- Issue:
- 132
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0132-0132-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- AIF arterial input function -- AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve -- CN Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy -- DCE dynamic contrast-enhanced -- DFO diabetic foot osteomyelitis -- dSUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of delayed phase -- DWI diffusion-weighted imaging -- DWIr high b-value signal pathological-to-normal bone ratio on DWI -- iAUC internal area under the gadolinium curve -- ICC intraclass correlation coefficient -- Ktrans volume transfer constant -- Kep reflux rate -- MR magnetic resonance -- MRI magnetic resonance imaging -- NPV negative predictive value -- PPV positive predictive value -- RI retention index -- ROC receiver operating characteristics -- ROI region of interest -- SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of standard phase -- TIC time-intensity curve -- Ve volume fraction of the extravascular-extracellular matrix -- 18F-FDG PET/CT 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography
Diabetic -- Foot -- Osteomyelitis -- Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy -- Diffusion-weighted imaging -- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging -- Positron emission tomography computed tomography
Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques
Medical radiology
Periodicals
616.075705 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0720048X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109299 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0720-048X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.738050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20913.xml