Prioritising performance indicators for sustainable construction and development of university campuses using an integrated assessment approach. (20th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Yan; Gu, Yanfang; Liu, Chunlu
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 202(2018)
• Page Start: 959
• Page End: 968
• Publication Date: 2018-11-20
• Subjects: Analytical hierarchical process -- Qualitative scoring system -- Sustainability indicators -- Sustainable construction and development -- University campuses; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.217
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Sustainability assessment tools are considered to play a vital role in strategies to reorient universities towards sustainability in a systematic way. However, strategic selections of the main existing assessment tools may be inappropriate from economic, environmental and social perspectives. In addition, there may be geographical differences in indicators and weight determinations. Therefore, this paper proposes a new approach that uses a qualitative scoring method (QSM) and an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) for determining and prioritising the key sustainability indicators for local university campuses. Based on QSM, this approach allows evaluation of the extent to which local higher education institutions value each sustainability criterion. The quantified extents are then converted into a prioritisation matrix through AHP. The sustainability indicators are first selected through a literature review and categorised into three hierarchies based on their characteristics. Current official sustainability publications of the Australian universities in the state of Victoria are chosen as the data sources. The results reveal that the issues of culture and energy are considered important sustainability sub-criteria, and this strongly suggests including the indicators 'research on sustainability' and 'renewable energy use' in local sustainability assessment systems. The proposed approach constitutes a flexible tool for decision-making in relation to the sustainable construction and development of university campuses for policymakers in government and higher education institutions.