Hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve accuracy of predicting the size of hepatocellular carcinoma at pathology. (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dong, San-Yuan; Yang, Yu-Tao; Wang, Wen-Tao; Zhu, Shuo; Sun, Wei; Zeng, Meng-Su; Rao, Sheng-Xiang
• Is Part Of: Acta radiologica. Volume 63:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: 734
• Page End: 742
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: Hepatocellular carcinoma -- tumor size -- gadoxetic acid -- magnetic resonance imaging -- pathology; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiography, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1177/02841851211014194
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0284-1851

Abstract

Background: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, scientific evidence is lacking for recommending a particular sequence for measuring tumor size. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the size of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measured on different gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences using pathology as a reference. Material and Methods: A total of 217 patients with single HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before surgery were included. The size of the HCC was measured by two abdominal radiologists independently on the following sequences: T1-weighted; T2-weighted; b-500 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); and arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases. Tumor size measured on MRI was compared with pathological size by using Pearson correlation coefficient, independent-sample t test, and Bland–Altman plot. Agreement between two readers was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Correlation between the MR images and pathology was high for both readers (0.899–0.955). Absolute error between MRI and pathologic assessment was lowest on hepatobiliary phase images for both readers (reader 1, 2.8±4.2 mm; reader 2, 3.2±3.4 mm) and highest on arterial phase images for reader 1 (4.9±4.4 mm) and DWI phase images for reader 2 (5.1±4.9 mm). Absolute errors were significantly different for hepatobiliary phase compared with other sequences for both readers (reader 1, P ≤0.012; reader 2, P ≤0.037). Inter-reader agreements for all sequence measurements were strong (0.971–0.997). Conclusion: The performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences varied with HCC size, and the hepatobiliary phase may be optimal among these sequences.