An In Vitro Study of the Effects of Mechanical and Enzymatic Isolation of Stromal Vascular Fraction on Wound Healing. (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dai, Lien-Guo; Huang, Nien-Chi; Kang, Lan-Ya; Fu, Keng-Yen; Hsieh, Pai-Shan; Dai, Niann-Tzyy
• Is Part Of: Annals of plastic surgery. Volume 88(2022)Supplement 1S
• Page Start: S13
• Page End: S21
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction -- ultrasonic physics method -- exosome; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003087
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-7043

Abstract

Abstract: The adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is considered to be an attractive source of stem cells in cell therapy. Besides stem cells, it also contains functional cells, such as macrophages, precursor cells, somatic stem cells, and pericytes. Collagenase digestion is the most frequently used method to isolate SVF, but it is time-consuming and costly and has some problems, such as infectious agents and immune reactions. In this research, we compared the yield, cell population ratios, and cell viability when isolating SVF by the ultrasonic physics (U-SVF) method and traditional enzymatic method (E-SVF). Then, we isolated exosomes from U-SVF and E-SVF, respectively, and cocultured them with fibroblasts to investigate the potential of applying this cell secretion in wound repair. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the ultrasonic method and enzymatic method in terms of cell viability, cell numbers, or the expression of CD markers of stem cells. However, exosome analysis identified a greater number and smaller size of exosome particles obtained by U-SVF. In terms of cell proliferation efficiency, although the proliferation efficiency of U-SVF was lower than that of E-SVF. Trilineage differentiation experiments revealed that both E-SVF and U-SVF had good differentiation ability, owing to high stem cell content. Finally, E-SVF and U-SVF exosomes were cocultured with fibroblasts. The efficiency of fibroblast migration increased in the SVF exosome treated groups, and the expression of related genes (integrin α5β1) was slightly upregulated; however, the expression of FAK, AKT, ERK, and RhoA was significantly upregulated at 24 hours. From the abovementioned experiments, we found that there was no significant difference in stem cell-related characteristics between SVF isolated by ultrasonic cavitation and SVF isolated by the enzymatic method. In addition, exosomes secreted by SVF may have excellent therapeutic effect on skin injuries, which provides a new viewpoint and therapeutic strategy for soft tissue repair.