682 IMPACT OF DISCHARGE INTERVENTIONS FOR OLDER PATIENTS LEAVING HOSPITAL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REVIEWS. (8th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Connell Francischetto, E; Jones, J; Davies, S; Allen, K; Combes, G; Damery, S
• Is Part Of: Age and ageing. Volume 51(2022)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2022-03-08
• Subjects: Aging -- Periodicals; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac036.682
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-0729

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The UK has an aging population and there is an increasing need for additional care and support services for elderly patients discharged from hospital. Despite a large evidence base on different discharge services there is inconsistent findings on their effectiveness. This systematic review of reviews aimed to evaluate the impact of a variety of discharge interventions on older people leaving hospital. Method: Ten databases were searched (including Medline and The Cochrane Library) using multiple key search terms related to 'systematic reviews', 'older people' and 'discharge'. Only systematic reviews of interventions for people aged over 60 years that provided additional support or adapted their discharge processes were included. Outcomes of interest included mortality, readmissions, length of hospital stay, patient health status and costs. Abstract, title and full-text screening was conducted independently by two reviewers. Interventions were categorised by intervention type and a narrative synthesis was conducted on data extracted. Results: Of the 8, 748 title and abstracts reviewed, 859 full texts were assessed for eligibility, of these 91 were taken forward to quality assessment and 66 moderate or high-quality reviews were included in the final synthesis. Interventions were categorised into 10 types and had varying impact on outcomes. A statistically significant positive impact on the outcomes of interest was found for: Interventions providing 'rehabilitation, therapy or care at home (or in the community) around the time of discharge' reducing length of stay; 'primary care interventions', 'Discharge planning/coordination or case management' and 'patient education'. Conclusion: This systematic review of reviews shows that different types and configurations of discharge interventions can benefit older patients in multiple ways when compared to usual care and highlights which intervention types make no difference or have negative impacts. These findings will help to inform the development of new discharge interventions and the direction of future research.