Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. (1st March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. (1st March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
- Authors:
- Sandberg, EM
Twijnstra, ARH
van Meir, CA
Kok, HS
van Geloven, N
Gludovacz, K
Kolkman, W
Nagel, HTC
Haans, LCF
Kapiteijn, K
Jansen, FW - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). Study design: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. Population: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Methods: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). Primary outcome: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. Results: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR ( n = 74) and DCR ( n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women withAbstract : Objective: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). Study design: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. Population: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Methods: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). Primary outcome: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. Results: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR ( n = 74) and DCR ( n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. Tweetable abstract: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. Tweetable abstract: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BJOG. Volume 126:Number 6(2019)
- Journal:
- BJOG
- Issue:
- Volume 126:Number 6(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 126, Issue 6 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 126
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0126-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 804
- Page End:
- 813
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-01
- Subjects:
- Laparoscopic hysterectomy -- urinary catheter -- urinary retention
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1470-0328&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1471-0528.15580 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1470-0328
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2105.748000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20889.xml