Chemical Differences Between PM1 and PM2.5 in Highly Polluted Environment and Implications in Air Pollution Studies. Issue 5 (10th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Yele; He, Yao; Kuang, Ye; Xu, Wanyun; Song, Shaojie; Ma, Nan; Tao, Jiangchuan; Cheng, Peng; Wu, Cheng; Su, Hang; Cheng, Yafang; Xie, Conghui; Chen, Chun; Lei, Lu; Qiu, Yanmei; Fu, Pingqing; Croteau, Philip; Worsnop, Douglas R.
• Is Part Of: Geophysical research letters. Volume 47:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-03-10
• Subjects: chemical differences -- PM1 -- PM2.5 -- primary and secondary aerosols -- highly polluted environment; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Periodicals; Lunar geology -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1029/2019GL086288
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8276

Abstract

Abstract: Submicron aerosol (PM1 ) species measured by aerosol mass spectrometers have been widely used to validate chemical transport models; however, the uncertainties due to chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 are poorly constrained. Here we characterized such differences in a highly polluted environment in north China in winter. Our results showed that the changes in PM1 /PM2.5 ratios as a function of relative humidity (RH) were largely different for primary and secondary species. Secondary organic and inorganic aerosol (SOA and SIA) presented clear decreases in PM1 /PM2.5 ratios at RH > 60% during periods with high SIA contributions (>50%), likely driven by the changes in aerosol hygroscopicity and phase states, while the traffic and coal combustion OA had limited dependence on RH. Thermodynamic modeling showed negligible impacts of PM differences on predictions of particle acidity, yet these impacts can cause a difference in aerosol water content by up to 50–70%. Plain Language Summary: Current air pollution studies rely largely upon aerosol mass spectrometers that provide real‐time measurements of submicron aerosol (PM1 ) species, and in many studies, PM1 aerosol species are used to validate those of PM2.5 in chemical transport models and estimate particle acidity and aerosol water content which are key parameters in studying heterogeneous reactions. However, the uncertainties in air pollution studies due to the chemical differences of PM1 and PM2.5 are poorly constrained, particularly in highly polluted environment, for example, China and India. We found that the changes in PM1 /PM2.5 ratios as a function of relative humidity were largely different for primary and secondary aerosol species in highly polluted environment, which was likely driven by the changes in aerosol hygroscopicity and phase states. The chemical differences of PM1 /PM2.5 ratios were also found to have negligible impacts on predictions of particle acidity, yet these impacts can cause a difference in aerosol water content by up to 50–70%. Considering the rapid increases in the deployments of aerosol mass spectrometers worldwide, the results in this study are of great importance for a better understanding of the uncertainties in both modelling and observations. Key Points: We observed large chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 under high relative humidity periods in highly polluted environment The RH dependence of PM1 /PM2.5 ratios of primary and secondary species was largely different due to different hygroscopicity The chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 have negligible influences on particle acidity prediction, yet have a large impact on AWC