The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions. Issue 3 (13th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Woodward, Rachel; Dawes, Antonia; Edmunds, Timothy; Higate, Paul; Jenkings, K. Neil
• Is Part Of: Area. Volume 52:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 505
• Page End: 513
• Publication Date: 2020-06-13
• Subjects: armed forces reserves -- critical military studies -- military geography -- qualitative methods; Geography -- Periodicals; 910
• DOI: 10.1111/area.12629
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0004-0894

Abstract

Abstract : Military geographical research often requires direct engagement with military institutions. Although the morality of such engagements is often debated, the details of engagement in practice have been less scrutinised. Scrutiny is important, as military engagements can shape research‐derived critiques and can influence the communication of research outcomes to both military and academic research communities. Military engagement comprises the communication of data, theories, and concepts about military activities and phenomena, with military personnel and institutions, in textual, representational, and interpersonal modes. The paper examines Geography's history of research engagement to show the complexities and debates around this seemingly straightforward idea. It then introduces a research project and wider research programme on the UK armed forces reserves which provides the empirical context from which we draw our observations about military engagement. We then consider two issues, language and institutional cultures, for their insights into the complexities of military engagement. We conclude by considering the politics of engagement in contemporary critical military geographical research. Abstract : Military geographical research often requires direct engagement with military institutions. This paper explores the complexities around this idea with reference to research conducted on the UK armed forces reserves. Considering the politics of engagement is central to contemporary critical military geographical research.