OP22 Societal Perspective On Cost Drivers For Health Technology Assessment. (2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khowaja, Asif; Mitton, Craig; Qureshi, Rahat; Bryan, Stirling; Magee, Laura; von Dadelszen, Peter; Bhutta, Zulfiqar
• Is Part Of: International journal of technology assessment in health care. Volume 33:Supplement 1(2017)
• Page Start: 10
• Page End: 11
• Publication Date: 2017
• Subjects: Medical technology -- Periodicals; Technology assessment -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317001246
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-4623

Abstract

Abstract : INTRODUCTION: Understanding cost drivers and estimating societal costs are important challenges for economic evaluation of health technologies in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) (1). This study assessed community experiences of health resource utilization and perceived cost drivers from a societal perspective to inform the design of an economic model for the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trials (2). METHODS: Qualitative research was undertaken alongside the CLIP trial in two districts of Sindh province, Pakistan. Nine focus groups were conducted with a wide range of stakeholders, including pregnant women, mothers-in-law, husbands, fathers-in-law, healthcare providers at community and health facility-levels, and health decision-/policy-makers at the district-level. The societal perspective included out-of-pocket (OOP), health system, and program implementation costs related to CLIP. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software. RESULTS: Most pregnant women and male decision makers reported a large burden of OOP costs for in- and out-patient care, informal care from traditional healers, self-medication, childbirth, newborn care, transport to health facility, and missed wages by caretakers. Many healthcare providers identified health system costs associated with human resources for hypertension risk assessment, transport, and communication about patient referrals. Health decision-/policy-makers recognized program implementation costs (such as the mobile health infrastructure, staff training, and monitoring/supervision) as major investments for the health system. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of care-seeking practices revealed financial implications for families of pregnant women, and program implementation costs for the health system. The societal perspective provided comprehensive knowledge of cost drivers to guide an economic appraisal of the CLIP trial in Sindh, Pakistan.