Unusual Trade or Market Manipulation? How Market Abuse is Detected by Securities Regulators, Trading Venues and Self-Regulatory Organizations. Issue 2 (5th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Austin, Janet
• Is Part Of: Journal of financial regulation. Volume 1:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 263
• Page End: 283
• Publication Date: 2015-08-05
• Subjects: securities regulators -- market abuse -- market manipulation -- insider trading -- market surveillance -- enforcement; Financial institutions -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; Financial services industry -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; 346.0805
• DOI: 10.1093/jfr/fjv003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2053-4833

Abstract

Abstract: Securities regulators protect the integrity of capital markets by detecting, investigating and then prosecuting, insider trading and market manipulation, known collectively as market abuse. The main method of detection of market abuse is surveillance of markets by software designed to identify unusual trading. Such market surveillance is undertaken by trading venues, self-regulatory organizations, and securities regulators. Two other important methods used to detect market abuse are suspicious transaction reports made to regulators by financial intermediaries and voluntary reports to regulators by the public of possible market abuse. This article describes the main methods of detection of market abuse in five jurisdictions which comprise over 50 per cent of the world's securities markets, namely the USA, Canada, Germany, the UK, and Australia. Furthermore, given the growing internationalization of securities markets, there exists the possibility that many market abuse offences will not be confined to one country and may span two or more jurisdictions. As such regulatory bodies must increasingly work together to exchange information to detect market abuse. This article also examines how such information is exchanged, the challenges in exchanging such information and suggests ways in which this could be improved. In particular, more investment is needed in market surveillance systems to improve both the detection of market abuse and to enable securities regulators to swiftly determine the cause of any market disruption. This will in turn facilitate a more targeted regulatory response to ensure that such a disruption is not repeated.