Genomic selection in the German Landrace population of the Bavarian herdbook. Issue 11 (1st November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gertz, M.; Edel, C.; Ruß, I.; Dodenhoff, J.; Götz, K.-U.; Thaller, G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal science. Volume 94:Issue 11(2016)
• Page Start: 4549
• Page End: 4557
• Publication Date: 2016-11-01
• Subjects: carcass traits -- deregression -- fertility traits -- genomic selection -- pig -- validation; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0581
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8812

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim of our study was to compare different validation methods with respect to their impact on validation results and to evaluate the feasibility of genomic selection in the German Landrace population of the Bavarian herdbook. For this purpose, a sample of 337 boars and 1, 676 sows was genotyped with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. Conventional BLUP breeding values for fertility, growth, carcass, and quality traits were deregressed and used as phenotypes in genomic BLUP. The resulting genomic breeding values were also blended with information from the full conventional breeding value estimation to include information from nongenotyped parents. Subsequent validation used forward prediction, realized reliabilities, and theoretical reliabilities. The results indicate that the validation methods showed a relatively large effect on in the displayed reliability levels in our study: forward prediction reliabilities were found to be much lower than the conventional parent-average reliabilities whereas corresponding realized and theoretical reliabilities were found substantially greater. Theoretical reliabilities appear to be the most consistent validation approach tested in our study, because they avoid the use of proxy variables. Generally, our results suggest a substantial potential for a genomic selection implementation for the Bavarian herdbook by using both sows and boars. Theoretical genomic reliabilities of direct genomic values of selection candidates were, on average, 31 to 36% greater than the conventional parent average reliabilities. However, the inclusion of residual information from conventional breeding values had only a marginal effect on reliabilities.