Yeast Pro- and Paraprobiotics Have the Capability to Bind Pathogenic Bacteria Associated with Animal Disease. Issue 1 (1st February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Posadas, Gabriel A.; Broadway, Paul R.; Thornton, Justin A.; Carroll, Jeffery A.; Lawrence, Amanda; Corley, Jimmie R.; Thompson, Amber; Donaldson, Janet R.
• Is Part Of: Translational animal science. Volume 1:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 60
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2017-02-01
• Subjects: adhesion -- direct antagonism -- paraprobiotics -- pathogenic bacteria -- yeast probiotics; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.2527/tas2016.0007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2573-2102

Abstract

Abstract: Live yeast probiotics and yeast cell wall components (paraprobiotics) may serve as an alternative to the use of antibiotics in prevention and treatment of infections caused by pathogenic bacteria. Probiotics and paraprobiotics can bind directly to pathogens, which limits binding of the pathogens to the intestinal cells and also facilitates removal from the host. However, knowledge of bacterial binding, specificity, and/or capability is limited with regard to probiotics or paraprobiotics. The goal of this study was to characterize the qualitative and quantitative nature of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae probiotics and three S. cerevisiae paraprobiotics to adhere to thirteen different pathogenic bacteria using scanning electron miscroscopy and filtration assays. On average, the yeast probiotics (LYA and LYB) exhibited overall greater ( P < 0.05) adhesion to the pathogenic bacteria tested (41% and 34%) in comparison to paraprobiotics (23%, 21%, and 22%), though variations were observed between pathogens tested. The ability of Salmonella and Listeria to utilize components of the yeast as a nutrient source was also tested. Bacteria were cultured in media with limited carbon and supplemented with cell free extracts of the probiotics and paraprobiotics. Salmonella exhibited growth, indicating these pathogens could utilize the yeast lysates as a carbon source. Listeria monocytogenes had limited growth in only one of the lysates tested. Together, these data indicate that the interaction between probiotics and paraprobiotics occurs in a strain dependent mechanism. Administration of probiotics and paraprobiotics as therapeutics therefore needs to be specific against the bacterial pathogen target.