Advancing implementation frameworks with a mixed methods case study in child behavioral health. Issue 3 (30th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barwick, Melanie; Barac, Raluca; Kimber, Melissa; Akrong, Lindsay; Johnson, Sabine N; Cunningham, Charles E; Bennett, Kathryn; Ashbourne, Graham; Godden, Tim
• Is Part Of: Translational behavioral medicine. Volume 10:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 685
• Page End: 704
• Publication Date: 2019-01-30
• Subjects: Implementation science -- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research -- Active Implementation Frameworks -- Child behavioral health -- Motivational interviewing; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; 616.0019
• DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1869-6716

Abstract

Abstract: Despite a growing policy push for the provision of services based on evidence, evidence-based treatments for children and youth with mental health challenges have poor uptake, yielding limited benefit. With a view to improving implementation in child behavioral health, we investigated a complementary implementation approach informed by three implementation frameworks in the context of implementing motivational interviewing in four child and youth behavioral health agencies: the Active Implementation Frameworks (AIF) (process), the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (factors), and the Implementation Outcomes Framework (evaluation). The study design was mixed methods with embedded interrupted time series and motivational interviewing (MI) fidelity was the primary outcome. Focus groups and field notes informed perspectives on the implementation approach, and a questionnaire explored the salience of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) factors. Findings validate the process guidance provided by the AIF and highlight CIFR factors related to implementation success. Novel CFIR factors, not elsewhere reported in the literature, are identified that could potentially extend the framework if validated in future research. Introducing fidelity measurement in practice proved challenging and was not sustained beyond the study. A complementary implementation approach was successful in implementing MI in child behavioral health agencies. In contrast with the typical train and hope approach to implementation, practice change did not occur immediately post-training but emerged over a 7 month period of consultation and practice following a discrete interactive training period. The saliency of CFIR constructs aligned with findings from studies conducted in other contexts, demonstrating external validity and highlighting common factors that can focus planning and measurement. Abstract : A complementary implementation approach was successful in implementing MI in child behavioral health agencies over a 7-month consultation and practice period. New factors for the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research are proposed.