Accuracy of Risk Estimates from the iPrevent Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Management Tool. Issue 4 (19th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Phillips, Kelly-Anne; Liao, Yuyan; Milne, Roger L; MacInnis, Robert J; Collins, Ian M; Buchsbaum, Richard; Weideman, Prue C; Bickerstaffe, Adrian; Nesci, Stephanie; Chung, Wendy K; Southey, Melissa C; Knight, Julia A; Whittemore, Alice S; Dite, Gillian S; Goldgar, David; Giles, Graham G; Glendon, Gord; Cuzick, Jack; Antoniou, Antonis C; Andrulis, Irene L; John, Esther M; Daly, Mary B; Buys, Saundra S; Hopper, John L; Terry, Mary Beth
• Is Part Of: JNCI cancer spectrum. Volume 3:Issue 4(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09-19
• DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz066
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-5091

Abstract

Abstract: Background: iPrevent is an online breast cancer (BC) risk management decision support tool. It uses an internal switching algorithm, based on a woman's risk factor data, to estimate her absolute BC risk using either the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) version 7.02, or Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm version 3 models, and then provides tailored risk management information. This study assessed the accuracy of the 10-year risk estimates using prospective data. Methods: iPrevent-assigned 10-year invasive BC risk was calculated for 15 732 women aged 20–70 years and without BC at recruitment to the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Calibration, the ratio of the expected (E) number of BCs to the observed (O) number and discriminatory accuracy were assessed. Results: During the 10 years of follow-up, 619 women (3.9%) developed BC compared with 702 expected (E/O = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.05 to 1.23). For women younger than 50 years, 50 years and older, and BRCA1/2 -mutation carriers and noncarriers, E/O was 1.04 (95% CI = 0.93 to 1.16), 1.24 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.39), 1.13 (95% CI = 0.96 to 1.34), and 1.13 (95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24), respectively. The C-statistic was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.73) overall and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.77), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.66), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.64), and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.68), respectively, for the subgroups above. Applying the newer IBIS version 8.0b in the iPrevent switching algorithm improved calibration overall (E/O = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.15) and in all subgroups, without changing discriminatory accuracy. Conclusions: For 10-year BC risk, iPrevent had good discriminatory accuracy overall and was well calibrated for women aged younger than 50 years. Calibration may be improved in the future by incorporating IBIS version 8.0b.