Biliary Stone Disease in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with Somatostatin Analogs: A Multicenter Study. (6th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brighi, Nicole; Panzuto, Francesco; Modica, Roberta; Gelsomino, Fabio; Albertelli, Manuela; Pusceddu, Sara; Massironi, Sara; Lamberti, Giuseppe; Rinzivillo, Maria; Faggiano, Antongiulio; Spallanzani, Andrea; Ferone, Diego; Prinzi, Natalie; Rossi, Roberta Elisa; Annibale, Bruno; Colao, Anna Maria; Campana, Davide
• Is Part Of: Oncologist. Volume 25:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 259
• Page End: 265
• Publication Date: 2019-11-06
• Subjects: Neuroendocrine neoplasms -- Gallstones -- Adverse events -- Prophylactic cholecystectomy -- Ursodeoxycholic acid; Oncology -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Oncology; Tumors; Neoplasms; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0403
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1083-7159

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the mainstay of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) treatment. Biliary stone disease is reported as a common side effect of SSAs, with a frequency ranging from 10% to 63%. Studies on SSA‐treated patients for acromegaly report an increased incidence of biliary stone disease compared with the general population, whereas data on patients with NETs are few. Guidelines are based on weak evidence, thus resulting in conflicting recommendations. The aim of the study is to evaluate biliary stone disease incidence, complications, and risk factors in a large population of SSA‐treated patients with NETs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of NET in seven dedicated centers from 1995 to 2017 were included at the time of SSA start. Results: A total of 754 SSA‐treated patients were evaluated. Patients with history of cholecystectomy or with known biliary stone disease were excluded; 478 patients were included. Among them, 118 patients (24.7%) received prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). During the study period, 129 patients (27.0%) developed biliary stone disease; of them, 36 (27.9%) developed biliary complications. On multivariate analysis, primary gastrointestinal (GI)‐NET (hazard ratio [HR] 1.76) and related surgery (HR 1.58) were independent risk factors for biliary stone disease. Conclusion: We report a high incidence of biliary stone disease particularly in GI‐NET or GI surgery. UDCA prophylaxis does not seem to have a protective role. Our data suggest that all patients with primary GI‐NET or undergoing abdominal surgery should be considered for prophylactic cholecystectomy; no conclusion could be drawn on the indication of prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with primary pancreatic or thoracic NET for whom abdominal surgery is not planned. Abstract : Biliary stone disease is a common side effect of somatostatin analog treatment for neuroendocrine tumors. This article evaluates incidence, complications, and risk factors for biliary stone disease in a large population of patients treated with somatostatin analogs.