Assessing Patient Satisfaction Following Blepharoplasty Using Social Media Reviews. (19th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tseng, Christopher C; Patel, Rushi; Desai, Amar D; Shah, Vraj P; Talmor, Guy; Paskhover, Boris
• Is Part Of: Aesthetic surgery journal. Volume 42:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: NP179
• Page End: NP185
• Publication Date: 2021-09-19
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab345
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-820X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Because patient satisfaction is a significant qualitative consideration in measuring aesthetic surgery outcome, it is important to characterize the individual factors that shape the patient perspective about blepharoplasty. Objectives: This study analyzed reviews by blepharoplasty patients on the aesthetic surgery social media platform RealSelf.com to determine which aspects of the surgical process have the most significant impact on patient satisfaction. Methods: Blepharoplasty reviews were gathered from RealSelf.com with an automated web crawler. These reviews were characterized as positive or negative, then given a specific category that more specifically defined the theme of the review. Additional variables, including the specialty of the reviewed physician and any patient self-reported ratings, were documented. Results: A total of 1991 reviews pertaining to blepharoplasty were collected. Among reviews with self-reported "worth it" ratings, 93.5% were positive. Following categorization of all reviews, 1865 (93.7%) were positive and 126 (6.3%) were negative. Of the positive reviews, the most common overall themes were bedside manner (n = 899, 48.2%), aesthetic result (n = 859, 46.1%), and overall comfort (n = 58, 3.1%). Among negative reviews, most pertained to aesthetic result (n = 100, 79.4%), and bedside manner (n = 14, 11.1%). The most frequently encountered physician specialties performing blepharoplasty were plastic surgery (n = 1101, 55.3%), ophthalmology (n = 634, 31.8%), and otolaryngology (n = 69, 3.5%). Conclusions: The majority of reviews were positive. The most prominent factor driving positive reviews was bedside manner, followed by aesthetic results. Negative reviews were most frequently attributed to suboptimal aesthetic results. Most blepharoplasties in our study cohort were performed by plastic and oculoplastic surgeons.